The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

In the indictments of Russian spies, it was admitted no American was involved.

Trump is not suspected of any crime, and apparently Rosenstein's two mandate letters were unable to even meet the legal requirement for a special counsel that some specific crime be investigated.

Trump was not a witness to any crime, and DoJ stated in the past that a president cannot be indicted anyhow.

So the only thing Mueller could have in mind in interviewing Trump would be to entrap him into some conflicting statement which could be referred for impeachment.

The whole Mueller probe rests on the fake dossier paid for by Hillary and put together by Fusion. It was Fusion who met with the Russian lawyer before and after she met with Don Jr.

If Mueller wanted to be fair, why did he hire all Democrats?

"In the indictments of Russian spies, it was admitted no American was involved."-johnfibs

This is a lie. It was never "admitted" that no American was involved in any collusion or conspiracy. Never.
You really need to learn to read legal documents, johnny.

"Trump is not suspected of any crime, and apparently Rosenstein's two mandate letters were unable to even meet the legal requirement for a special counsel that some specific crime be investigated."-johnfibs

This is a lie. You made it up.

"Trump was not a witness to any crime, ..."-johnfibs

This is a lie. You couldn't possibly know that. You made it up.

"and DoJ stated in the past that a president cannot be indicted anyhow."-johnflubs

This irrelevant. Even if a President can't be indicted DURING HIS PRESIDENCY, if he has information about the investigation, the American people still have a right to know what happened. And if a President can't be indicted, then what has he got to be afraid of, johnny? Why can't he tell us the truth?

"So the only thing Mueller could have in mind in interviewing Trump would be to entrap him into some conflicting statement which could be referred for impeachment."-johnfibs

This is a lie. Or if you actually believe the foolishness you posted, then you're really naive and ignorant about the purpose of the investigation. Take your pick. Lying or dimwitted, johnny?

"If Mueller wanted to be fair, why did he hire all Democrats?"-johnfoibles

You already see what Republicans like Nunez do to an investigation. Why do you think it's a good thing to have the foxes guarding the hen house? Republicans on the team would have been leaking from day one. Look at the White House. Nobody in there can keep their mouths shut.

The only way to be "fair" is to keep the investigation secret until it is concluded.

Well, that does it. Your entire lying post has been debunked, johnny. I think we can all go to lunch now.

Clownkicker wrote:"In the indictments of Russian spies, it was admitted no American was involved."-johnfibs

This is a lie. It was never "admitted" that no American was involved in any collusion or conspiracy. Never.
You really need to learn to read legal documents, johnny.

"Trump is not suspected of any crime, and apparently Rosenstein's two mandate letters were unable to even meet the legal requirement for a special counsel that some specific crime be investigated."-johnfibs

This is a lie. You made it up.

"Trump was not a witness to any crime, ..."-johnfibs

This is a lie. You couldn't possibly know that. You made it up.

"and DoJ stated in the past that a president cannot be indicted anyhow."-johnflubs

This irrelevant. Even if a President can't be indicted DURING HIS PRESIDENCY, if he has information about the investigation, the American people still have a right to know what happened. And if a President can't be indicted, then what has he got to be afraid of, johnny? Why can't he tell us the truth?

"So the only thing Mueller could have in mind in interviewing Trump would be to entrap him into some conflicting statement which could be referred for impeachment."-johnfibs

This is a lie. Or if you actually believe the foolishness you posted, then you're really naive and ignorant about the purpose of the investigation. Take your pick. Lying or dimwitted, johnny?

"If Mueller wanted to be fair, why did he hire all Democrats?"-johnfoibles

You already see what Republicans like Nunez do to an investigation. Why do you think it's a good thing to have the foxes guarding the hen house? Republicans on the team would have been leaking from day one. Look at the White House. Nobody in there can keep their mouths shut.

The only way to be "fair" is to keep the investigation secret until it is concluded.

Well, that does it. Your entire lying post has been debunked, johnny. I think we can all go to lunch now.

Here we have Clown the Licker stealing money from the taxpayers again.. On a porn site during working hours.... that and posting something he cant even back up. More shit pulled out of fat black ass pretending its facts

Of course, what I posted above remains entirely germane and intact.

Mueller cannot question, as a subordinate, the actions and decisions of the Chief Exec.

Trump is not accused of any crime, nor a witness to one, and Mueller cannot even state what potential crime he has even been investigating for over a year.

This was all a sham, and it all stemmed from the fake dossier which was used to lie by omission to a FISA judge to wiretap Trump.

This was all baloney to attempt to hide the massive corruption of the Obama Administration.

The whole Mueller probe rests on the fake dossier paid for by Hillary and put together by Fusion. It was Fusion who met with the Russian lawyer before and after she met with Don Jr.

Bingo!

^^^^^^ Wash, rinse, repeat.

Republicans keep telling that big lie until their ignorant followers believe it.

It is important, as Clown notes, to keep our thoughts as fresh as the April rain.

In that rain vein, I found this post as pure as the driven snow:



Mueller cannot question, as a subordinate, the actions and decisions of the Chief Exec.

Trump is not accused of any crime, nor a witness to one, and Mueller cannot even state what potential crime he has even been investigating for over a year.

This was all a sham, and it all stemmed from the fake dossier which was used to lie by omission to a FISA judge to wiretap Trump.

This was all baloney to attempt to hide the massive corruption of the Obama Administration.

Mueller moved very quickly to get the Manhattan Madame in front of a Grand Jury.

I suspect that Roger Stoned bragged directly to her about his ties to WikiLeaks, Guccifer and perhaps told her the President knew all about it.

Stone is an amusing fellow, but of what import?

The sole reason Mueller wants to nail him is that Stone supports Trump.

The only reason for Mueller to have hired 17 partisan Democrats is to nail Trump somehow.

But that isn't a fair, or neutral, or objective approach.

A former KGB general says Trump was secretly filmed screwing Russian prostitutes and he was blackmailed with it. I wonder what Trump discussed with Putin at that "closed door" meeting to keep the tape hidden?

When Hillary had her closed door meeting with Putin, did she discuss the uranium sale and what money the foundation would get in return?

Trump knew they would be meeting with representatives of the Russian state.

Trump knew they were being offered Russian state intelligence.

Trump intended to use Russian intelligence offered by Russian agents against Hillary.

And Trump did not alert the FBI!!!

:o

Why did Hillary meet in secret with Putin?

To arrange the sale of uranium in exchange for money to her foundation?

elklindo69 wrote:Trump knew they would be meeting with representatives of the Russian state.

Trump knew they were being offered Russian state intelligence.

Trump intended to use Russian intelligence offered by Russian agents against Hillary.

And Trump did not alert the FBI!!!

:o

And you have proof of all of this.. ???? Care to share where you got this... OH! Never mind you pulled it out of Clowns asshole? REally douche bag