The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

We learned today during Congressional testimony by the DOJ IG that while FBI Directory, Comey used private email to conduct FBI business over which he sent classified information and a criminal investigation has been opened. That is why he rushed for the cameras to declare Hillary's actions of doing the same thing were not criminal and not charges should be brought.

True.

Apparently another reason is that Comey knew that Obama lied about not knowing about Hillary's server.

He knew that two two emailed back and forth even in adversary lands, and that foreign entities had apparently intercepted.

The corruption is shocking.

The corruption is shocking.

Confident Hillary would win they put all their eggs in one basket and stacked the deck, but they went up against a man "FAR" superior to them...now they are paying the price

So that "nothing" is the price they're paying, eh?

Wow, Tool, Trump sure showed them. :shock: :lol:

So that "nothing" is the price they're paying, eh?

Tell Comey, McCabe and many others who have lost their cushy high ranking jobs that what's happened to them is nothing :lol:

More to be fired and many will end up in jail, this party has just started, I assure you if those government officials weren't positive Hillary was going to win, they wouldn't have covered up for her or her minions. They would still have their jobs and not facing criminal charges.

But you morons keep saying Mueller has "nothing to show" for a year's work and millions of dollars spent. Tell that to Manafort and Flynn and Cohen and the others. They lost their cushy high ranking jobs and they are facing charges. And there are a lot more to come. "More to be fired and many will end up in jail, this party has just started"

How do you explain that, Tool? How do you maintain that cognitive dissonance of thinking that anyone you don't like is 'paying a price' but everyone you like is somehow not 'paying a price' and they'll all be found innocent or be pardoned?

And this nonsense of you partisan tools continually saying Mueller has "nothing to show" for all the money he's spent.
Meanwhile you predict all these charges against Comey and Hillary and FBI agents when there is "nothing to show" yet from those inquiries either. But somehow you can't predict all the charges coming against Trump's cronies and criminal friends from the valuable work Mueller's team has been doing. :lol:

Horowitz and Chris were still trying to pretend the overall import of the report was no political bias in the ultimate decisions, but that was ludicrous.

Strzok was chief investigator, and his bias was egregious.

Who lost?

Well, no good citizen wants his FBI or DoJ to be partisan and crooked, so American citizens lost because of this tsunami of crooked behavior.

I do NOT want Trump's FBI and DoJ to start wiretapping Democrats or make up fake dossiers to try to prevent some Democrat from becoming a future president.

Under Obama, these agencies were as corrupt as any Banana Republic.

Clown...!
Hillary is already serving her sentence...Life without the Presidency , reduced to wearing a
Russian ushanka at college commencement ceremonies.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

As for Comey , he is condemned to forever stand outside the White House in the rain
hawking his books no one is interested in reading.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oooooh, brutal. Trump is a ruthless mastermind!

Imagine how lucky Manafort must feel, getting off so easy with jail time. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

But you morons keep saying Mueller has "nothing to show" for a year's work and millions of dollars spent.

Trump is still President and has higher poll numbers than when the investigation started...so Mueller's investigation hasn't touched Trump.

Once again, Tool, the investigation is not about Trump. It's about Russian meddling with our election and possible illegal collusion by the Trump campaign.

But even so, you have no idea whether or not the investigation has touched Trump. You're just making up stupid shit again.

But even so, you have no idea whether or not the investigation has touched Trump.

I do know, it would have been leaked, plus most of all, I take my President's word that he did nothing wrong.

Yup, you da Tool! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

No, Clown is wrong about the purpose of the investigation.

It is crystal clear from the texts and emails that the sole purpose was to stop Trump.

Strzok and other corrupt partisans set out "lures" to make up the notion that an investigation into Russia was needed.

The DNC server was never hacked, and that is why the DNC refused to turn it over to the FBI.

Horowitz and Chris are desperately trying to pretend there was no political bias when the entire IG report is about nothing but bias.

How many anti-Hillary texts did Strzok or Page or McCabe or Ohr send? None. Their goal was to stop Trump, and they even said so.

Yep, when the person heading up the investigation puts in writing that he's going stop Trump from becoming President and that fails he has an insurance policy it clearly shows his investigation can't be trusted.

In any other criminal investigation, "EVERYTHING" that investigator touched would be thrown out, including any wiretaps or evidence he collected through search warrants.

That's untrue, Tool.

You're just making up stupid shit again.

By the way, Strzok hasn't been with the investigation for over a year. So everything discovered since Strzok left isn't a problem, is it. But you clowns keep pretending Strzok's month on the Mueller investigation is significant, when it's not. Most of the incriminating evidence has been uncovered after he left.

Most of the incriminating evidence has been uncovered after he left.

If a warrant or investigation is based upon inaccurate or questionable information, anything that come from that warrant or investigation is thrown out. You will see!

Strzok had nothing to do with instigating the Mueller investigation, dummy. He was a bit player who was only there a month.

The investigation is not based on his work.

Strzok had nothing to do with instigating the Mueller investigation

Strzok started the investigation and made up lies to get phones and computers wiretapped. You shall see.

Anything linked to Strzok would be fruit of the poisoned tree.

Hopefully, when Flynn wins anything he needs to on appeal, he will make a fortune giving talks about how he was targeted by partisan crooks pretending to have any interest in "law enforcement."

Flynn can't appeal his "guilty" pleas, johnny.
You think Mueller wouldn't insist on that?

Seems you should have gone to Harvard, johnny. :lol:

Flynn can't appeal his "guilty" pleas, johnny.

Dude, there has been no conviction or sentence it's still an open case because Mueller keeps pushing it back, all he has to say is he's changed his mind and wants to fight it. Then it's back into Mueller's court.

Donnie should keep his chins up. He'll surely win Mueller's "no-bail" prize.

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol:

Because I didn't go to Harvard, I'm aware that he would withdraw the guilty plea.

And should, given the stunning bias in his case.

It's amazing that clown thinks a person can't withdraw a plea. It happens daily in every State and every good prosecutor that actually has real untainted evidence is then prepared to take it to trial and prove guilt without the plea...but Mueller can't do that because his evidence is tainted.

Of course you can withdraw a plea, dimwit. But that's not what johnforbes was talking about, is it, and neither was I.

johnforbes said he could win on appeal.
I said you can't APPEAL a guilty plea if the agreement precludes that possibility, as Mueller's would.

Tool, try to stay on the topic of what has actually been said if you're going to open your ignorant yap to criticize.
Your off-topic criticism only reveals your desperate attempt to divert and distract.

Flynn is guilty. He said so himself. Live with it, conservatards.

By the way, dummy, you don't need any evidence whatsoever, tainted or otherwise, to get a guilty plea.

I find it entertaining to see how Trump claims that any accused campaign member is innocent and treated unfairly by Mueller's "Witch Hunt".

But his minions will fight tooth and nail to suppress the evidence............

Clown's appeal remarks were appalling.

Obama's minions, like Rod, are fighting tooth and nail to NOT give Congress the documents they deserve.

Flynn can't appeal his "guilty" pleas, johnny.

There has been no trial, he can change his guilty plea any time he wants to. Even if there had been a trial, if there's evidence the prosecution withheld evidence or presented evidence that was tainted, you can certainly appeal the whole trial.

Tool, there is no trial with a guilty plea, dummy. There is only sentencing with a guilty plea.

Criminy, Tool, if you don't want to think, at least turn on some Perry Mason reruns to acquire a legal education superior to that of johnforbes.

Tool, there is no trial with a guilty plea, dummy. There is only sentencing with a guilty plea.

Wrong! He has to go before a judge where the prosecutor outlines the charges, the Judge listens to both sides and if the accused so choses he can stipulate to the prosecutor's charges before the judge, if so the trial is over and it moves to the sentencing... unless the Judge wants the prosecutor to present certain evidence or doesn't accept the guilty plea suspecting it may have been coerced. You've been schooled once again dude!

Tool, you're just making up stupid shit again.
Going before a judge to plead guilty is not a trial. It is an appearance before a judge.

"The court clerk reads out the offence you have been charged with. You are then asked if you want to plead guilty or not guilty. If you plead guilty at this stage, there's no trial and you are convicted and sentenced by the court."-

"When a criminal defendant is confronting a criminal case and is slated to go to trial, it is the criminal defendant's decision whether to proceed to trial or to plead guilty in order to avoid it."-https://www.hg.org/article.asp?id=33486 You can't do both, dummy

"If you and your lawyer decided that you should plead guilty, the court will arrange a sentencing appearance [not a trial] so that the judge can sentence you. ... If you plead not guilty, your case has to go to trial"

You've been schooled once again. Making up stupid shit just never pays around here. This isn't one of your inane Trump rallies for morons.

Clown, I've already outlined why the trial hasn't taken place, and that it must take place before a person can be sentenced. Live with it dude.

You didn't "outline" anything, dimwit.

You just made up some stupid shit.

You've been schooled once again. Live with it, dude.

Clownslacker's law degree stems from the University of Matchbook Cover.

I would explain everything wrong with what Clown has said, but using that much bandwidth might crash the Interwebs.

^^^^^ Translation: "I got nothin'."

Well, I have a foreign language interpretation program here and it provides this result:

"I got plenty."

johnny, if you're going to give us your same old song and dance, at least get the lyric right.

It's "I got plenty of nothin'..."

Now Trump has conflated his two favorite defenses. His fear level is rising.

I can guarantee that Trump will never voluntarily sit with Mueller. Trump knows with 100% certainty that Mueller will issue obstruction charges and knows that more of his swamp rats will be indicted soon......

Elkin, anybody could guarantee that.

For a clearly partisan person like Mueller, with a team which is 100 percent Democrat, it would just be a perjury trap.

The reason the FBI and DoJ don't want to reveal the original Russia document is that this entire probe was just made up.

It was all as fake as luring Carter Page and Papadopolous to the UK, giving them booze, and trying to get from them some pretext involving Russia.