The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

So let's say you are headed out tonight with your gal (or "ho" as the kids say) and you plan on smokin' and tokin' and so forth.

And you enter a big party and spot Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

Then, in the other corner, laughing and joking with models and athletes, you see Trump.

Who ya gonna go talk to?

ANYONE but any of the people you mention, johnny.

You sell your soul pretty cheaply, but I guess you know what it's worth.

To be serious for a second, I wonder whether Chuck -- who slam-dunked the SAT -- might be interesting if off camera and off ideology.

Of course, there's always that line from "Double Indemnity": "I wonder if you wonder."

You know...if Trump is in an open marriage, that's his business. However is another issue to be on your third marriage, pandering to the Christian conservatards, while banging into a porn star. So don't go around claiming that you are pro-life while you're paying a porn star hush money...

Elk, it's obvious that Trump being such as stud muffin banging all those beautiful women makes you feel really inferior. Your hero is Barak who married a gorilla twice his size because it's closer to your life.

I think johnforbes must have listened to the Trump interview on FOX this morning if he's trying to distract from the news with an idiotic thread like this.

This morning Trump almost insured that he will now be deposed by Avenatti.

Trump has been claiming that a deposition would be a huge imposition on him doing his job as President. But Trump just showed that he can find 25 minutes to rave on FOX and contradict his previous statements on a number of things,including the Daniels case, which means the judge will see that the truth can only be arrived at under oath.

The deeper question is whether any sitting president should do that.

It is easy to imagine a future Democrat president not wanting that as a precedent.

Also, what was the predicate crime Mueller set out to investigate?

There was none, and Rosenstein stated none in his secret followup letter.

There was no predicate crime, and there was no intel which started the whole Russia nonsense.

All this was, from the very start, was Democrats upset that Hillary lost.

Remember how nutty the Ken Starr thing was going from Whitewater to Monica's blue dress? As a country, nobody really wanted that.

Sure, Bill Clinton brought that on himself, and nobody forced him to lie, but every citizen felt a little weird hearing Starr tell how Bill used a cigar as a sex toy on his intern.

You know, some really bad investigative drift.