Page 1 of 1

If Ever a Guilty Plea Had to be Revisited

Posted: Sun Mar 18, 2018 9:37 pm
by johnforbes
So the judge presiding over the Flynn case was Obama appointee Contreras.

He was a pal of Peter Strzok, but even he did not think Flynn had lied.

Apparently that was McCabe, later fired for his corruption.

So Contreras was recused, and not voluntarily by himself, but not before Flynn decided to plead guilty because they were apparently threatening to bankrupt his son too.

When all is said and done, Flynn looks like the best person in this whole mess.

Re: If Ever a Guilty Plea Had to be Revisited

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 10:46 am
by RealJustme
Flynn should be filing a lawsuit for the corrupt investigation that lied, mislead and threatened not only Flynn but his family to get him to sign a piece of paper pretending they had more than they really had, especially on Flynn's son.

"Sign this and we'll back off or your family and just swat you on the back of the hand, don't sign it and we will make your families' lives hell while destroying them just as we've destroyed your life savings trying to defend yourself for what ever we dream up. We may not be able to prosecute them but we sure as the hell can charge them with crimes that'll finish their careers and savings. Your decision General."

Obama was running a banana republic that's still partially intact.

Re: If Ever a Guilty Plea Had to be Revisited

Posted: Mon Mar 19, 2018 3:35 pm
by johnforbes
I thought the prior folks were corrupt.

But I was wrong.

They were far, far more corrupt than I thought.