The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

All these so called scientist have been telling us as the earth warms glaciers will melt causing the oceans to rise. After extensive research and testing I've debunk that theory. I took a glass full of ice cubes and filled it with water to rim, I then waited until the ice melted, you'll never guess what happened to the water level...it dropped. As a means to double test my findings I half filled an ice tray with water and stuck it into my freezer, again you'll never guess what happened, the water had risen as it froze.

I've submitted my paper for peer review but my experiments seem to conclude that water expands when it freezes thus taking up more mass, thus melting of the glaciers would cause the oceans to recede. I've tried to keep this simple because it's a radical concept that debunks what the so called scientists have been telling us. :ugeek:

^^^^ Conservative 'science' at its best. :lol:


No, really, that's the best they have.

At least my article is based upon true science that can be measured and affirmed.

Please professor clown tells us how water takes up more mass than that same amount of water frozen.

I have heard that glaciers are Not solid ice.......but have caverns, in some cases as large as cathedrals....
and all these caverns are filled with air....Imagine that! What could all this mean?? :o :o

"Please professor clown tells us how water takes up more mass than that same amount of water frozen."-ReallyReallyStupid

It's simple, dimwit, water DOESN'T "take up more mass than the same amount of water frozen."
Any junior high kid knows the mass of the water remains constant, but the volume displaced by frozen water increases because of the rigid crystal structure of ice which leaves more space that is filled with air between the water molecules.
That's why ice cores can tell us so much about the climate of thousands of years ago--the air trapped in the ice crystals stores a record of the air of those times. You melt the ice, discard the water, and analyze the air's content.

The correct statement is "liquid water takes up less volume than the same amount of water frozen."

Does that help at all, dummy?
Go read a science book, fer cripes sake.....after you take an ESL class, of course. Otherwise the science would be as meaningless to you as your idiotic 'experiment' about 'climate change'. :lol:

"and all these caverns are filled with air....Imagine that! What could all this mean??"-sillydummy

It means ice melts when exposed to temperatures above 0 degrees celcius? Ya think?
Like when liquid water runs through cracks in the glaciers surface and melts large spaces below.

Take a class, dummy. You'll be amazed at how the world really works.
(Hint: it's not at all like your handlers tell you.)

It's simple, dimwit, water DOESN'T "take up more mass than the same amount of water frozen."

I rest my case

The average thermometer has more degrees than Clownslacker, who has no degree in climate science.

Clown thinks melted glaciers would make the oceans rise, why because Gore told him so :lol: :lol: :lol:

I've done a great job of demonstrating scientifically that the mass of the oceans would decrease if glaciers melted, resulting in oceans water level to lower.

RealTool once more demonstrates that he shouldn't discuss science because of his gross ignorance of the very basic concepts involved.

Again, mass does not change in a given amount of water whether you add energy to it or subtract energy from it.
If you boil it, (add energy) it takes up much more volume, but the mass is the same.
If you freeze it, (subtract energy) its volume increases, but the mass remains the same.

The mass of the water did not burst the pipes, dimwit. The increased volume of the ice from the same mass of water burst the pipes.

I rest my case. RealTool is an ignoramus.
Look up the meaning of "mass" in a scientific reference book, Tool. It doesn't mean what you think it means.

As to the sea level, when glaciers melt and the water flows to the sea, the level with rise.
A simple experiment will prove it.
Take a pan of water that is half full. This represents the oceans.
Now add a quart of water to the pan. The surface level will rise. I guarantee it. :lol:

Now don't you feel silly?

If you freeze it, (subtract energy) its volume increases, but the mass remains the same.

I rest my case. :ugeek: The increased mass caused these pipes to burst. For you to try and argue the oceans will rise if the ice melts is just plain silly. :lol:

Dimwit, there was no increased mass. The mass of the water stayed exactly the same.
The increased volume of the ice burst the pipes.
How does a liberal get basic scientific ideas through the thick skulls of conservatives? Facts and reason are beyond their ken.


"For you to try and argue the oceans will rise if the ice melts is just plain silly. "-RealTard

For you to argue that the ocean levels WON'T rise if you add hundreds of cubic miles of water to them is just plain stupid.

I think the problem for your typical conservatard is they think glaciers are underwater already, like ice cubes in RealTool's glass, but won't they be surprised to learn that glaciers are actually up in the mountains. :lol:

A study by the University of California San Diego has claimed that by 2050, the Sun is expected to become cool. You might think "what's the big deal," but remember that this means the solar activities that create the heat of the Sun to sustain life on Earth may diminish. And the last time it happened was in the 17th Century, when the Thames River froze. Scientists call this the "Maunder Minimum".

Physicist Dan Lubin at the university and his team studied the past event and concluded that were are in for a worse case. The Sun is expected to get much dimmer than last time and, in scientific terms, it is a "grand minimum" -- a time period in the 11-year solar cycle when the solar activities are at the lowest point.

Also read: Scientists warn of 'mini ice age' that could hit Earth and freeze major rivers by 2030

According to the study, titled Ultraviolet Flux Decrease Under a Grand Minimum from IUE Short-wavelength Observation of Solar Analogs and published in the journal Astrophysical Journal Letters, this grand minimum will be 7 percent cooler than such periods from the past.

Scientists also said that the Sun might have another cooling period in a decade.

However, predicting a solar minimum or maximum is a challenge to scientists because of the non-linear characteristic of solar activities that happens every day. During a minimum cycle, though solar cycles still occur, the intensity is very low, while during a maximum cycle, solar flares go up and sun spews out billion-ton ***** of electrified gas into space. These two extremes can bring about some major global and regional climate changes.

Are you now wondering what effect grand minimum will have on Earth? Lubin said such cold spells thin out the stratospheric ozone layer first, which will affect wind and weather patterns. He also warned that not all regions will experience a dip in temperature. Rather, in some places, the mercury will rise.

Now the question that arises is, will this event trigger the upcoming ice age everyone is talking about?

Researchers at the Northumbria University have claimed that a mini ice age will start by 2021 and is expected to reduce the effect of global warming, but not stop it.

Oh dear.
Now we've come full circle. First, we were all going to die from the coming ice age, which should have arrived by now but has not.
Then it was going to be global warming that will be the death of us all.
Now we learn that although in the coming decades the sun will cool and we will experience global cooling that will freeze rivers never before frozen, it will still be global warming that gets us in the end.
One hardly knows which way to run.

With any luck you'll be on the first ship out to Mars and then both your troubles and ours will be over.

It is as it ever has been:
The whip cracks, the AssClown jumps.

Silly ass word game to come.

Even assuming the polar ice cap had melted, my conclusion would be that it all came to my lane, which has been buried in ice for days.

Ice chippers, ice melt...

Ice, ice, baby.

RealJustme wrote:

If you freeze it, (subtract energy) its volume increases, but the mass remains the same.

The increased mass caused these pipes to burst.

Frozen pipes.JPG

Apparently Justme never paid attention in science class.

Google the term; conservation of mass.

:lol:

The increased mass caused these pipes to burst.

True dat!

^^^^ A retard agreeing with a retard. What a surprise. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Which is the greater number AssClown,
7.7,
Or,
7.8.
You've had a week now. Google probably wasn't any help.
Consult with your masters in the Peoples Glorious Revolutionary Politboro and get back to us.
Quickly.
Or you will feel the sting of the lash.
But that's deeply ingrained into your DNA,
AND
my frequent beat downs have caused you to be accustomed to it.
Yo?

Which is the greater number AssClown,
7.7,
Or,
7.8.

Clown will argue the 7.7 is higher because it's on top, just as he argues that just because water expands as it freezes doesn't mean there's more mass.

Those who practice the religion of global warming become flustered and change the subject when you point out water levels would actually lower if the mass of the glaciers melt. There would just be water where the glaciers were and it'll be much lower than the height of the glaciers.

^^^^^ Fucking moron :lol: :lol: :lol:

He's not just trolling. He actually believes it.

RealTool doesn't understand that water (like shit) runs down hill. That's why he couldn't be a plumber either.
That's why he chooses to be 'a leader of men' instead of doing something productive. :lol:

He's not just trolling. He actually believes it.

No dude you're the one that fell for it. While Al Gore claimed our coast lines would flood within a few years he bought up beach front properties and it went right over you libtards' heads.

Simple question for you, Tool: Are glaciers found in the oceans or are they up on the land?

If you can't answer that one, you certainly can't discuss science. :lol:

I'm not on this fine forum merely to educate Clown (a quixotic endeavor), but to enlighten mankind.

Or "peoplekind," as the Left Wing nut Justin Trudeau says.

In that regard, I've developed the Law of Posting Conservation, which says that wacky energy can neither be created nor destroyed, but is instead transformed from one nutty post from Clowntoker to another.

Simple question for you, Tool: Are glaciers found in the oceans or are they up on the land?

The ocean holds 97 percent of the Earth's water; the remaining three percent is freshwater found in lakes, below the ground, in rivers and glaciers.

Glaciers make up less than .3% of the earths water, as they melt instead of ice there would be water but at a much lower level than the glaciers. Icebergs "which are glaciers hat have broken off into the oceans" would actually lower the ocean level because their mass would shrink as they melted.

Now don't you feel silly for letting me "once again" set you up :lol: :lol: :lol: