The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

They've just announced they've call of the divorce. I was expecting this after the latest rounds of new investigations into her handling of classified emails on Weiner's laptop. He knows way too much on Huma and Hillary to allow him to testify against Huma, as her husband he can't!

Of course he can, dimwit.

Where did you study law? At the johnforbes Wishy-Washy Legal Academy?

You flubbed it again Comrade Homo Sambo AssClown Loser Marxist Tool. As husband and wife they can't be compelled to testify against each other.

Where did YOU get your law degree? At the Peoples Glorious Revolutionary academy of law and concrete finishing?

Reliably, the AssClown Turd Boy Insipid, just stepped in it again. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Of course they can't be compelled to testify against each other.
But they can certainly testify against each other all they like, you moron.

As The Tool would say, "Now don't you feel stupid?" :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The AssClown Insipid obviously graduated from the Pap Smear Clinic the johnforbes Wishy-Washy Legal Academy opened on the side in a desperate attempt to make enough money to keep the doors open.

If they are compelled to testify against each other ....
Hillary may compel both of them to commit suicide..! :o :lol: :lol:

;ROFLMAO @ Clownassholelicker.. never seen him flip flop so fast. I wonder if he got a hernia over it. Amazing how he thinks he always right about something. Think being the operative word

You flubbed it again Comrade Homo Sambo AssClown Loser Marxist Tool. As husband and wife they can't be compelled to testify against each other.

You flubbed it again clown.

The Marital Testimony Exception (in their State) a court can't allow the testimony of a spouse to be entered into the record unless the party on trial consents to its disclosure. Therefore, even if Weiner was willing to reveal damaging information about Huma, unless she consents, the testimony can't be used against her. There also what's called a Notice of Exception, If a spouse knows that his or her spouse is trying to testify against him or her, the affected spouse must provide notice of his or her desire to assert the exception a certain amount of time before the testimony is heard. If the crime was committed against him or her, such as in cases involving domestic violence a spouse can't invoke the Marital Testimony Exception. As long as they're still married they can scheme, discuss their defenses and what they plan on doing to conceal the crimes and not have to worry about the court obtaining that information.

I sure like schooling you clown.

I sure like schooling you clown.

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Oops. Stand by for either an emoticon spewing silly ass word game or the Comrade Homo Sambo AssClown Loser Marxist Tool to disappear for a few days to allow his humiliation to fade.

I throw the bait out there and clown takes it every time, a sure sign of insanity. Rest assured this will disrupt clown's whole day as he attempts to come up with a diversion

You flubbed it again, Tool.

Why you presented state law in a Federal case is baffling, dummy.
Since you think Huma is going to be tried for breaking Federal law, she would be tried under Federal rules, not state rules. And those rules allow a spouse to testify if he/she chooses.

"Under U.S. federal common law, the spousal testimonial privilege is held by the witness-spouse, not the party-spouse, and therefore does not prevent a spouse who wishes to testify from doing so.[4]
Chief Justice Warren E. Burger. "Trammel v. United States, 445 U.S. 40, 100 S. Ct. 906 (1980)"


I sure like schooling all three of you morons.

You lose again clown, the Federal law on the subject is brood in nature so that it can be applied in all 50 States, but it can't "remove" a State provided privilege in such matters.

RealTool once again resorts to making up stupid shit in a desperate attempt to look like he hasn't humiliated himself.

He thinks he's more knowledgeable that Warren Burger. :lol:

Clown lets bump this up to the court of appeals where they'll consider if Huma and the Weiner had an expectation of private spousal conversations based upon the laws of the State they lived in...we both know the court would rule they did. Engage your brain for once instead of your mouth, there is no other plausible reason Huma would call off the divorce days after criminal investigation (s) were opened concerning her sending classified information to her husband's private computer. It's a legal move dude!

It was already bumped up to the Supreme Court. Why go backwards to the appeals court?
It doesn't matter what their "expectations" were.

The reason they are staying married is so that neither can be COMPELLED to testify against the other.
However, that doesn't mean Weiner couldn't testify against her in Federal Court if he chose.

"He knows way too much on Huma and Hillary to allow him to testify against Huma, as her husband he can't!"-RealStool

Apparently neither wants to be compelled to testify against the other, so they stay married to avoid that predicament.
But your assertion that Weiner COULDN'T testify under Federal law is simply wrong.

Clown was hoping he and Weinner could spend some time together in a Cell. After all Clownassholelicker loves to lick assholes. He had his head stuck up Ojackaess asshole for 8 years

The reason they are staying married is so that neither can be COMPELLED to testify against the other.
However, that doesn't mean Weiner couldn't testify against her in Federal Court if he chose.

Go back to the top of the thread and read my posts, dude you really are dense. It would never reach the Supreme Court. Hell some Federal Judge in Hawaii would probably even step in to defend Hillary...I mean Huma. It ain't going to happen. Live with it dude.