The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

The woman who spoke to The Post shared a secretly recorded conversation she had on the phone with Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) about sexually explicit material he sent her. In the chat, he warned her against using the material “in a way that would negatively affect my career.”

:o :shock: :lol:

elklindo69 wrote:The woman who spoke to The Post shared a secretly recorded conversation she had on the phone with Rep. Joe Barton (R-Tex.) about sexually explicit material he sent her. In the chat, he warned her against using the material “in a way that would negatively affect my career.”

:o :shock: :lol:

thanks for the info Elkshit. did you pull that out of Clownlickers asshole with all the other Crap you post on here.

If this is true...I fail to see how this woman was hurt...
Sound to me like she just wants some kind of reward for her silence! :o :lol:

Other than being dumb enough to trust her via phone, what did he do wrong?

Wasn't he divorced at the time?

It's not a crime to be an idiot....otherwise Elk and Clown would be sharing a cell.... :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now it's being reported, on Drudge, the woman is denying It was she who released the photo and e mails.

Probably because she was informed that if she had released them, she could be arrested under Texas revenge porn law enacted in 2015.

The congressman has announced he was contacted by Capitol police and he asked them to conduct an investigation.

This one may have backfired on the person who intended to do harm.

So I suppose it's safe to say that Barton is no longer a "family values" republican politician?

:roll: :lol:

When Bill Clinton was busy raping and mauling his way through staffers and anyone near him with a vagina, Elkindoofus and others of his ilk said, "Its only sex, a personal matter between consenting adults. Move on, move on!"

For Trump it's OK for a guy to get locked up for 10 years for shoplifting.

Trump wanted a guy who kneeled during the national anthem to get fired.

And according to Trump, a guy who raped a 14 year old should be in the US Senate?

:o :shock: :roll:

Clinton remained in the W House despite a claim of rape.

What Elkin conveniently fails to mention is the difference between an allegation and something proven.

So you're saying elklindo is overlooking the same sort of thing you overlook with your posts, johnny?
You regularly post allegations as fact. You post endless, droning repetitions of unproven bullshit and think it's just fine.

For example, there is no evidence the yearbook was forged. You have provided no evidence of any kind that it was, but you just keep saying it over and over as if it's true, dummy.

No, that's wrong.

Allegations should be taken seriously, whether made by accusers of Bill Clinton or Roy Moore.

Hillary ran just last November, and if elected she would have brought predator Bill back into the White House despite allegations he raped Juanita Brodderick.

It is fair to suggest that Juanita was just saying that for politics.

Every allegation should be taken seriously, but then examined.

That is true of Bill Clinton and for Roy Moore.

That is the only fair approach.

If you just accept every allegation as a fact, then soon no male politician would remain in office.

Women are just as capable of honesty and dishonesty as men, so accusers must be examined.