The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

The yearbook was forged.

The shopping mall story was false.

The one girl did not have a phone in her bedroom.

Did the W Post find these women by offering cash?

Why did the Rove-McConnell PAC pay 32 million to defeat Moore?

Ya Elkshit. see everyone jumped to conclusions without facts the press went into a feeding frenzy . Al frankin was ignored by the press See the difference

What ever happen to Due process Elkshit.

Elkiin, you misunderstood my post.

I don't know, or particularly care, about Alabama politics.

Had there been evidence of Moore's guilt, my condemnation of such behavior would have ensured swiftly.

But...all the evidence is that the yearbook was forged, the mall story false, the one woman did not have a phone in her bedroom as a teen, the one mother said the story was not credible, the son-in-law of one said the tale was not true, and who is paying Gloria Allred?

Did the Post offer cash?

Why did McConnell's PAC pay 32 million to defeat Moore?

It's fairly clear Moore is on Mitch McConnell's hit list.
Which means McConnell is part of the swamp and has to go as well.

The yearbook was not forged.

The shopping mall story was true.

The one girl did have a phone in her bedroom.

It doesn't matter if the W Post found these women by offering cash.

Who cares if Republicans are eating their own?

Here's why the Revrend Homo AssClown really hates Moore, and what makes me support him even more:

Moore first caught the attention of many in the LGBT community after describing homosexual conduct as "an inherent evil against which children must be protected" in a 2002 child custody case involving a lesbian mother. In a 2005 television interview, Moore said "homosexual conduct should be illegal." He also said there's no difference between gay sex and sex with a cow, horse or dog.

Clownkicker wrote:The yearbook was not forged.

The shopping mall story was true.

The one girl did have a phone in her bedroom.

It doesn't matter if the W Post found these women by offering cash.

Who cares if Republicans are eating their own?

Nice links you provided as prof there Clown.. OH! Wait, never mind I see shit all over this post. Looks like you tried to pull facts out of your asshole again as usual.

It is beyond dispute that the yearbook was forged.

The shopping mall story was false.

The one girl did not have a phone in her bedroom.

Did the W Post find these women by offering cash?

Why did the Rove-McConnell PAC pay 32 million to defeat Moore?

It is beyond dispute that the yearbook was not forged.

The shopping mall story was true.

The one girl did have a phone in her bedroom.

It doesn't matter if the W Post found these women by offering cash.

Who cares if Republicans are eating their own?

The questions endure:

It is beyond dispute that the yearbook was forged.

The shopping mall story was false.

The one girl did not have a phone in her bedroom.

Did the W Post find these women by offering cash?

Why did the Rove-McConnell PAC pay 32 million to defeat Moore?

Well, that didnt go as planned...

Liberals have been attacking Judge Roy Moore relentlessly after a fishy story surfaced alleging that he sexually abused a 14-year-old girl decades and decades ago when the now-76 year old man was in his early 30s. Unfortunately, like most of their bombshell stories about people they don’t like, this one didn’t pass the smell or the reality test.

After the publicity began to die down and Harley Hannah, Moore’s accuser, began to get tired of lying all the time, she finally admitted the truth during an interview on MSNBC.

“It was like a bad dream,” she told host Dan Fitzpatrick. “I don’t really remember what happened but my mind filled in the gaps.”

“So you don’t actually know what happened?” Fitzpatrick pressed.

“I don’t remember everything that happened, but I know it,” Hannah replied.

“It doesn’t sound like you have much of an idea what Judge Moore actually did to you,” the interviewer responded as Hannah broke down in tears.

Libtards, meet your new Senator from Alabama.

It's hilarious to see Insipid getting behind MSNBC as a valid news source after calling them liars and fake news.

Now, if he could just figure out how to make the multiple allegations against Moore untrue. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dance for me, Turd Boy Insipid! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Clownkicker wrote:It's hilarious to see Insipid getting behind MSNBC as a valid news source after calling them liars and fake news.

Now, if he could just figure out how to make the multiple allegations against Moore untrue. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Dance for me, Turd Boy Insipid! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

You know Clownlicker for someone whos traitor, and lying POS who loves sucking Obamas asshole clean on daily basses. You have no room to talk about anyone

Come on, Clown, you understand this.

MSNBC has reverse credibility.

Because MSNBC is seeking to destroy Moore, it is very credible when the witness admits to friendly MSNBC that she has no idea what happened.

In other words, it was an admission against interest -- an admission that her claim was baseless.

That's too fine a point for the reverend AssClown to comprehend.
He's all about political expediency, what side of the story works for him in the moment.

He, and most libtards, can be on both sides of an issue several times in any given week.

Intrepid wrote:That's too fine a point for the reverend AssClown to comprehend.
He's all about political expediency, what side of the story works for him in the moment.

He, and most libtards, can be on both sides of an issue several times in any given week.

Thats an understatement.

Al Franken said he's already said he's sorry for he did to those women so everyone needs to get over it and move on. He said he's staying in office and will be running again "I said I'm sorry, so this matter is closed"

"Come on, Clown, you understand this. MSNBC has reverse credibility."-johnforbes

Of course I understand it, johnny. Yet that is exactly the response I get from these imbeciles when I produce a FOXnews story with reverse credibility that contradicts the partisan party line of the tools here. That's why it's hilarious. Insipid is oblivious to his ongoing hypocritical double standard. (While namandgulf is just plain oblivious.)

But you have to notice that Insipid still didn't address his lie about Clinton being expelled. I wonder why that is. :lol:

Al Franken hit with groping allegation from second woman

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/11 ... d-her.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


TIME TO STEP DOWN FRANKENSTEIN YOU CHILD MOLESTER

namandgulfdumbfuck, you need to look up the word "child".

See what his handlers are feeding to the gullible? Now they have morphed it into "child molester".
Is there nothing the dimwitted won't believe without any evidence? Criminy.

But for some reason namandgulfdumbfuck doesn't care about the actual Republican child molester.
Not a peep out of him about that. :shock:

Clownkicker wrote:namandgulfdumbfuck, you need to look up the word "child".

See what his handlers are feeding to the gullible? Now they have morphed it into "child molester".
Is there nothing the dimwitted won't believe without any evidence? Criminy.

But for some reason namandgulfdumbfuck doesn't care about the actual Republican child molester.
Not a peep out of him about that. :shock:

You seem to know a lot about molesting children there Clownlicker

"TIME TO STEP DOWN FRANKENSTEIN YOU CHILD MOLESTER"-namandgulfdumbfuck

^^^^^You seem to think you know a lot about molesting children there namandgulfdumbfuck.
After all, you brought it up here without a shred of evidence. :o :lol:

Clownkicker wrote:"TIME TO STEP DOWN FRANKENSTEIN YOU CHILD MOLESTER"-namandgulfdumbfuck

^^^^^You seem to think you know a lot about molesting children there namandgulfdumbfuck.
After all, you brought it up here without a shred of evidence. :o :lol:

So your saying the pedophile should stay in office. Somehow I knew you would think like that being the child predator you are

^^^^ Finally, one of you conservatives comes out against pedophile Moore. Good for you, namandgulf.

So what is the evidence against Moore?

Sure, women who complain should be taken seriously, but when the leftist Washington Post brings out 40-year-old allegations a month before a Senate election, any reasonable person would be suspicious.

Then the forged yearbook, and the presence of Gloria Allred, and any journalist MUST be suspicious.

Even Chuck Todd from "Meet the Leftist Press" discussed whether Allred had a fake yearbook.

Gloria Allred (certainly a last name Comrade AssClown Loser Marxist Tool thrills to) refuses to produce the yearbook, signed curiously in December with two different colors of ink.

All in all, very odd indeed.