Page 1 of 1
California's 52 electoral votes may not count next election
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 8:44 am
by RealJustme
California is refusing to allow any portion of their election process to be reviewed by the federal government for possible voter fraud, Sessions has pointed out that California may be jeopardizing their electoral votes in future federal elections.
I see this going to Trump's Supreme Court and California isn't going to like the results. Sessions is correct, the Supreme Court will agree that the federal government has the authority to validate California votes that affect elections outside of California.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:02 am
by Intrepid
Gov. Moonbeam shoots the people of the land of fruits and nuts in the ass again.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2017 9:12 am
by johnforbes
Bet your bottom dollar that California doesn't want anybody looking at those voters.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 11:44 am
by namngulfvet
johnforbes wrote:Bet your bottom dollar that California doesn't want anybody looking at those voters.
Of course not. LIbs want open borders which allows ILLEGALS in. Libs dont want voter ID which allows ILLEGALS TO VOTE. yet they throw a fit when they think Russia help Trump..
Dems the HYPOCRITE party
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:09 pm
by RealJustme
The nice thing about Trump's request for registration data is the rats are already bailing, Trump has announced he's "not honoring" Obama's promise that nothing will happen to illegals who vote.
Even illegals have learned that Trump doesn't announce what he'll be doing to round up criminals, the fact that he's asking the States for the information has them scare shitless because they know there will become a day when ICE comes to doors of illegals who have registered to vote. They also know it won't be to warn them not to do it again. Watch for the Supreme Court to get involved and rule that the federal government does have the right to validate votes that effect elections outside of a State.
Democrats are to stupid to realize Trump has just insured they can no longer count on the illegal votes by the time 2018 elections rolls around, illegals registering to vote will be a thing of the past.
You libtards need to start thinking chess to understand Trump.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 1:47 pm
by namngulfvet
I know several ICE agents and they are in clean up mode with support of the local PDs.. hehehehe
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:02 pm
by Dogzilla
Hold your collective breaths, Sweethearts.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 4:48 pm
by RealJustme
Dog, you're the one that's been holding your breath that Trump will fail. Trump has already secured his next term, so get used to Trump for the next 7 and half years. The dude is Teflon.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:05 pm
by Dogzilla
tRumpf HAS already failed. Miserably.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2017 9:19 pm
by Intrepid
And you can't give us one example of how.
All you can do is make gratuitous assertions, which, if you had an education you would realize are worthless.
But, "Low" and behold, you are in the "throws" of a dilemma and you are reaping what you "sew."
All errors you made on these pages. And are perfect examples of the stupidity of public school teachers.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 7:32 am
by Dogzilla
You are the perfect example of the disgustingness of the human being.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:01 am
by RealJustme
Trump is setting those States up, you would have to be blind and still be thinking checkers if you don't see it. Trump knew some States would decline to comply with the voter registration information which in turn doesn't allow the government to validate their voter systems.
Before the 2020 Presidential election, the Supreme Court will rule that the government can decline to count the electoral votes for those States who refused to allow the validation of their systems.
Libtards will have an extreme melt down as Trump wins by the most stunning vote advantage ever!
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 10:42 am
by namngulfvet
Dogzilla wrote:tRumpf HAS already failed. Miserably.
Did Pelosi tell you that. the woman who has called Trump, Bush 5 times. Or the fake Indian Pocahontas, or was it the big crybaby obstructionist chuckles.. No, No, it was Killery who allow 5 Americans to be killed as she rolled over at 3 am and went back to sleep. I know it was Obonogo the biggest racist and Marxist in the country.. Really Dogshit.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 11:06 am
by Dogzilla
Sorry you weren't there.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 11:20 am
by elklindo69
According to Trump people were supposed to be tired of winning, yet the conservatards circle back to Clinton and Obama...
LMFAO
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 1:27 pm
by RealJustme
According to Trump people were supposed to be tired of winning, yet the conservatards circle back to Clinton and Obama...
Dude, please rewrite that so we know what you're trying to say, thanks!
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:11 pm
by johnforbes
Elkin's partisan hatred has made him incoherent.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:25 pm
by Dogzilla
You clowns know exactly what Elk is saying.....just like you know how disgusting Donnie and his crew are. You just elect to pretend otherwise.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 3:48 pm
by Intrepid
19553979_1633318126678211_1227888224502701926_n.jpg (17.08 KiB) Viewed 4781 times
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2017 4:32 pm
by Clownkicker
AssClown Steppinfetchit Insipid, please don't call johnforbes stupid.
Sure, he's as big an ignorant and dishonest partisan scumbag as you are, but let's try to keep it civil, alright, you unimaginative troglodyte?
Keep on shuckin' and jivin' on command, Loser Boy Insipid. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Sun Jul 16, 2017 8:30 am
by johnforbes
Thanks to Clownslacker for that rousing defense of me.
My life has contained many goals, but none so crucial as earning Clowntoker's respect and admiration.
Re: California's 52 electoral votes may not count next elect
Posted: Fri Jul 21, 2017 7:56 pm
by RealJustme
It's getting serious and California has been put on notice their electoral votes are in question if they don't comply with federal voting verification standards, just as some State's licenses can no longer be used as verification of identity outside of that State due to lack of controls or compliance with federal standards.