Page 1 of 1
DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:27 am
by johnforbes
Gowdy asked ace "security" person Johnson yesterday why a crime victim (purportedly the DNC) would not turn over the server which purportedly had been hacked.
Johnson -- the same dude who left the border open and 12 million illegals wandering around -- had no answer.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:35 am
by Clownkicker
Honestly, johnny, those "12 million illegals wandering around" were already here when Johnson took the job.
The number of illegals didn't increase under Obama, and pretending Johnson is responsible for them being here is just your usual dishonest partisan bullshit.
Incidentally, anyone who would turn over their server to the government without a legal warrant is an idiot.
The DNC had nothing to gain by doing so.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:59 am
by johnforbes
That's true, but my concept of a real "security" person is that they lessen the quantity of illegals rather than maintain or increase it.
All kidding aside, the DNC may well have been hacked. I don't have any idea either way.
But let's assume the DNC was hacked.
In that event, they would want to turn the server over to the forensic experts at the FBI, right?
If there was a crime, they would want it solved?
The way it was handled would make any reasonable person think they were never hacked, or that if so it was not the Russians and they are keeping the server in order to keep flogging the dead horse of Russia.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:14 am
by Clownkicker
"But let's assume the DNC was hacked.
In that event, they would want to turn the server over to the forensic experts at the FBI, right?"-johnforbes
Why? How would that change or help anything?
You want it solved by your own IT guys and prevented in the future.
WHO hacked you is almost a moot point in this case. Your own IT guys should be able to trace the hacker.
Since there is no legal recourse against Russia, what difference would it make to the DNC to have the law involved?
All the FBI has to offer the DNC is resources. That only matters to people without them. That only matters to people whose money is more valuable than their privacy.
The DNC could hire anyone they want to look into it and secure their system while maintaining their privacy.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:35 pm
by namngulfvet
So it was ok for Killery to break the law by not using a required server and using one in her basement. Thanks for admitting you are one dumbass stupid sheep. No wonder you call yourself "Clownlicker"
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 1:40 pm
by Clownkicker
Dear namandgulfdumbfuck,
Please quote me saying any such ridiculous thing or shut the fuck up, turd boi. LMFAO @ YOU :lol:
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 2:12 pm
by Intrepid
It's all quite obvious.
There were/are things on the server the DNC is frantic about the FBI not seeing.
Which makes it all the more important they be seen.
This will likely land some asses in jail, perhaps some important, well known asses.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 3:15 pm
by RealJustme
So how can the special counsel investigating Russian interference suppose to investigate it, if the DNC refuses to allow them to look at the prime piece of evidence?
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 6:15 pm
by johnforbes
It would be interesting to know how Comey, Rosenstein, and Mueller cooked this one up.
Comey leaked to get a special counsel. Like magic, Rosenstein appointed one the very next day.
With more magic, the special counsel became Comey's best friend.
Re: DNC Still Never Turned Over the Server
Posted: Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:33 pm
by RealJustme
Before this is over, Mueller will be taking the 5th.