The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

An NBC news report claims that Hillary Clinton, while secretary of state, shut down an investigation into an elite pedophile ring in State Department ranks in order to avoid scandal and protect the careers of high ranking officials and an ambassador.

The NBC investigation was broadcast at a time when they were a real news organization rather than a branch of the Democratic Party’s PR department, and provided internal State Department memos to back up claims of a massive Hillary Clinton elite pedophile ring cover-up.

Serious allegations concerning the State Department,” the NBC anchor announced, before launching into the disturbing details that mainstream media would be unable to report on in 2017.

“According to internal State Department memos the agency might have called off or intervened into investigations into possibly illegal, inappropriate behavior within it’s ranks allegedly to protect jobs and avoid scandals.

“This concerns a time when Hillary Clinton was secretary of state.”
There is an old saying in Washington that the cover-up is worse than the crime. But in this case both parts of it are disturbing,” Chuck Todd continued.

“Allegations of prostitution and pedophilia, and allegations that those crimes were somehow covered up or not looked into. So the State Department this morning is having to respond to those claims, and those investigations involve misconduct by State Department officials, including an Ambassador and security agents attached to then secretary of state, Hillary Clinton.

“The allegations are that these investigations were whitewashed, quashed altogether, and that those orders came from high up.”

“NBC has obtained documents relating to ongoing investigations into some disturbing allegations involving State Department personnel and at least one ambassador. A State Department memo says, quote, “the Ambassador routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.

The allegations are that these investigations were whitewashed, quashed altogether, and that those orders came from high up.”

“NBC has obtained documents relating to ongoing investigations into some disturbing allegations involving State Department personnel and at least one ambassador. A State Department memo says, quote, “the Ambassador routinely ditched his protective security detail in order to solicit sexual favors from both prostitutes and minor children.

“The memo also says a top State Department official directed State Department investigators to “cease the investigation” into the ambassador’s conduct.” It’s just one of what another document describes as “several examples of undue influence” from top State Department officials.”

And Dogshit stands up and cheers.

You sure do rant a lot about sex with kids. That almost always indicates projection for the purpose of taking the attention on oneself. Why don't you just tell us about your "little" problem?

Come on, Insipid.....Tell us about the last little boy that you molested.

I would not be surprised if Chucky "crybaby" Schumer is one of those assholes......
Everytime I see him on TV he looks like another Sandusky.....sick motherfucker :o

Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it Dogshit ?

Really, all that drinking is taking it's toll on you.
Pretty soon you won't even remember the password to the kiddie porn file on your computer.

Intrepid wrote:Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit is it Dogshit ?

Really, all that drinking is taking it's toll on you.
Pretty soon you won't even remember the password to the kiddie porn file on your computer.

What liberal do you know that can read and comprehend at the same time. Im betting you cant name 3 let alone a doz..

I'm not a liberal.

What liberal do you know that can read and comprehend at the same time.

That's the truth brother! They also can't listen and comprehend at the same time either.

Don't you guys have a tRumpf rally or something to go to??

Dog is so easily irritated by the truth.. :lol: :lol:

Dogzilla wrote:I'm not a liberal.

ROFLMAO! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Roll some more, flamingfag......That's my shit that you're rolling in.

RealJustme wrote:

What liberal do you know that can read and comprehend at the same time.

That's the truth brother! They also can't listen and comprehend at the same time either.

ROFLMAO! Poor Dogshit. Now you got him holding his tail between his legs peeing his panties.. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The smoke from these rumors has been swirling for some time now. But with all this smoke, can there be fire somewhere?

According to an explosive new piece of investigative journalism, Pelosi advocated through one of her organizations the donating of tens of thousands of dollars on behalf of the child prostitution industry.
Yes, really.

There is ample evidence to suggest that she was one of a number of high-ranking Democrat officials to have placed her mark of approval on multiple donations to the Democrat Party through a nefarious enterprise.

“The House Minority Leader has been caught with ties to underage trafficking and prostitution, for which she looks to have profited quite handsomely, and the details are disturbing.

A political action committee backed by Nancy Pelosi has been caught taking funds from the co-owner of a website linked to underage trafficking and prostitution.

You fruits just love those alt facts. Dumbass.

Dogshit's hind leg starts to jackhammer at the thought of a Donkey-Rat kiddie porn cabal.

Loser Boy AssClown Insipid always falls for any made up stupid shit his handlers feed him. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What an assclown tool Loser Boy Insipid is.
And he dances for me on command, too. Just watch.... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Now you have the libtards actually trying to defend Pelosi's ties to underage trafficking and prostitution. What the fuck is wrong with them?

Liberalism truly is a mental disorder.

Ties to child trafficking and underage sex?? Pelosi?? LMAO......You're thinking about tRumpf. He's your molester.

Madame Pelosi....profiting from child prostitution !....shocking and sick!
But why is Dog not surprised? :o :o

Dogshit's delighted. This opens up a whole new source for him.

Demos are like bananas........crooked.... every single one in the bunch. :lol: :lol: :lol:

The fact that your bullshit isn't true doesn't cause you little fucktards any discomfort at all in repeating it. You're miserable lowlifes, is what you are.

Dogshit, you've already admitted everything. I only point it out and rub your nose in it.

Stop getting drunk and admitting things on here if you don't want people to know.

"Liberalism truly is a mental disorder."-LoserBoyAssClownInsipid

Hmmmm, really? Let's take a quick look, shall we?

Conservatism-- the Dark Ages for a thousand years
Liberalism------ the Renaissance
Conservatism-- inbred royal families owning the colonies and colonists
Liberalism------ the Declaration of Independence and the United States of America, human liberty
Conservatism-- 'the problems of the rest of the world are their own, not ours'
Liberalism------ joined the war against Hitler and Mussolini and defeated them, stopped genocide in Bosnia
Conservatism-- start elective war in Iraq on false pretenses because President is pissed off at its leader
Liberalism------ 'tax and spend' (pay for what we want as we go)
Conservatism-- spend to benefit the wealthy (support the "military industrial complex", corporate farm subsidies, eliminate regulations and oversight) but don't raise taxes to pay for it. In fact, CUT taxes on the wealthy while the debt balloons beyond manageability. Remove health insurance from the most needy because it is 'too expensive', eliminate food programs for the poor, cut back on unemployment benefits, but keep mortgage interest deductions for people owning four houses. Insist women must become incubators and bear unwanted children they can't afford 'because all life is precious', but eliminate social assistance programs to support those children once they are born because 'they aren't our problem.'
Liberalism------ you can believe in whatever god you want. Just keep it away from our government and leave the rest of us out of it.
Conservatism-- 'My god is the only real one and our society must acknowledge it. We must build our society around it while denouncing and eliminating those who don't believe the same nonsense as me. You know, like Muslims. They believe in one god and his prophet sent to spread the word. Now THAT'S crazy.'

So which one is the actual mental disorder, Loser Boy?
If you and your Conservatism had its way, we would all still be in the Dark Ages with you.

Those are some astoundingly simplistic bifurcations there.

And you couldn't refute any of it, could you?

But please don't interrupt. Loser Boy Insipid will be along to perform any minute now.
I wouldn't want you to frighten him off.

Those bifurcations were too simplistic to be taken seriously.

Rhetoric is fine, and it is used all the time, but you can't divide up all those things like that and everybody knows it.

Oh, but we CAN. It's right there, JJ. Other than your silly games, can you dispute any of it?

Clownkicker wrote:And you couldn't refute any of it, could you?

But please don't interrupt. Loser Boy Insipid will be along to perform any minute now.
I wouldn't want you to frighten him off.

How can you refute something you pulled out of your asshole. theres no link to back it up so it had to drop out of your ass. Fucking moron.

johnny, I might be tempted to take your criticism seriously if you didn't have a track record of ignoring all the simplistic bifurcations of the silly 'conservatives' here (including yourself) from whom virtually every thread started over the past 10 years is a simplistic bifurcation, and you haven't opened your trap once to criticize them for it, just as you didn't criticize Loser Boy Insipid for his post about liberalism being a mental illness. But all of a sudden MY rhetorical bifurcations bother you. :lol:
You know what I think of hypocrites, johnny, so all I can do is laugh at you.

Honestly, johnny, this is a pornsite political board. Other than myself, snakeoil is the only poster here who brings any nuance to the topics 'discussed'. And whenever I do it, you clowns fall asleep and ridicule me for even trying to explain things rationally and in depth because your ilk can't read and take in that much information at one sitting. They say so over and over.
Now you're criticizing me for restraining myself by putting things into terms conservatives might be able to understand, and that's not fair.

"Sound bites" is the limit of the conservative mind. (See you current President for verification of this statement. Trump has perhaps a 5000 word vocabulary and that's why these tools love him. He communicates at their level of education and comprehension.)
After a point-by-point nuanced post, the clowns here actually brag about their ignorance of what is being discussed and try to put words into my mouth because they can't refute anything I actually said, just as you can't.

http://www.rawstory.com/2017/05/sex-sla ... ng-report/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Equating the Renaissance with "liberalism" is, just to cite one example, simplistic to the point of comedy.

To state the obvious with a sense of discovery, the person who wrote that lacks a D.Phil. in history from Oxford.

lame

johnny, we speak the vernacular here. (Face it, your dimwitted cohorts here speak nothing else)
So if you're going to insist on arguing some esoteric "poli-sci 101" narrow technical view of what qualifies as liberalism, you'll disqualify all your allies from taking part on this board.

liberalism----- "the holding of liberal views."
liberal---------- "open to new behavior or opinions and willing to discard traditional values." (e.g. Renaissance thinking that did just that)

conservative-- "holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion." (e.g. Dark Ages reactionary mentalities, like Republicans who blur religion and politics today)

If you expect a D.Phil. in history from Oxford to discuss everyday topics here (which is idiotic, even for you,) then you yourself are disqualified from posting.
It's a good thing you left the internet forever already, because you just kicked your own sorry ass.

Those bifurcations would sound good if put forward by a high schooler.

But come on, they are unbearably simplistic.

As for myself, it is true that I've left the Internet forever.

I'm gone, but the glorious memory remains.

JJ knows that he has been bested.

No, I actually find that list amusing.

But taking historical events and trying to cram their complexity into some conceptual box like "liberalism" is just silly.

How many pundits presently talking about conservatives have ever read Burke?

The liberals on "Meet the Press" or "Face the Nation" have never read Walter Lippmann's The Public Philosophy.

johnforbes is still confusing this pornsite discussion board with a grad school seminar.

But by all means, johnny, feel free to explain to us the finer points of how the Dark Ages weren't the result of conservative thinking controlling religion and government, and how the Renaissance was not born of liberal minds.

That should be a hoot. :lol:

If the AssClown wants to claim that the thinking, attitude and ideas from hundreds of years ago have not changed, then he should have no problem admitting that the thinking from the Democrat party that gave us slavery, the KKK and fought tooth and nail against school integration, the Civil Rights act of 1965 and the Voting Rights act have also never changed.

Once again the AssClown Loser Marxist Tool is savagely beaten down by the 36 ounce Louisville Slugger of The Painful Truth.
This is just too easy.

^^^^^ :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Yes, the AssClown Insipid is so stupid that he actually doesn't understand that it is the nature of liberalism to "change its thinking, attitude and ideas."
Only a moron would think anyone believes that liberals don't change. It's the very definition of "liberal" you imbecile.
If they didn't change their stone-age thinking, they would be conservatives just like you, dumbshit. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Why do you think the Dark Ages lasted so long? :shock:

Criminy, this clown Loser Boy Insipid is too stupid to walk the earth.

How does Weasel Boy Insipid take the beatings I give him repeatedly and still crawl back for more? Amazing.
I didn't think anyone that stupid could even feed himself, let alone type.
He has the intelligence of an amoeba. (No offense to the amoebae of the world.)

But he sure do dance gud! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The Dark Ages began, for this forum, on a chilly Friday in early May when Clowntoker first logged on.

The year was 1939 and the Internet was in its infancy.