The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Photo contradicts Pelosi's statement about not meeting Kislyak.House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Friday that she's never met with the current Russian ambassador, Sergey Kislyak. But a file photo shows Pelosi sitting across the table from Kislyak talking to him.

That's the ninth top Democrat this week caught in a lie about not meeting Kislyak. Trump should demand that they all be investigated since they insist Session be investigated for meeting him.

They are going to regret opening this can of worms.

They are going to regret opening this can of worms.

I don't think they are, they really truly believe that the same doesn't apply to them because they're liberal, therefor exempt from scrutiny. During a recent meeting with an Hispanic organization Pelosi said "white are people inherently prejudice" and she did so without blinking an eye.

Maybe when the libtards actually win an election ...

until then Schumer is just howling at the wind.. :lol: :lol:

Trump claiming Obama wiretapped his building reeks of desperation...

Way to go Donnie!!!

I suppose Trump will reveal his sources...Bannon???

:lol:

Even Dem sources are confirming the wiretapping.

A FISA court turned down the first attempt, in June or July, and approved the second in October.

So a sitting president ordered -- or de facto ordered -- a wiretap on a candidate.

Obama has made Nixon proud.

Of course Obama ordered it.......who else had anything to lose from a Trump victory? :o

sillydaddy wrote:Of course Obama ordered it.......who else had anything to lose from a Trump victory? :o

Well then the proof would be on the warrants.

Someone get the warrants!!!

:lol:

Well then the proof would be on the warrants.

Warrants?

RealJustme wrote:

Well then the proof would be on the warrants.

Warrants?

Trump demands a congressional investigation into the matter.

OK.

So where's the evidence that he will provide to the congress?

Waiting for the proof!!!

:lol:

RealJustme wrote:

Well then the proof would be on the warrants.

Warrants?

https://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/trum ... 18817.html

FBI wants the DoJ to reject Trump's wire tap claim against Obama...
Thus Comey is in effect telling the DoJ to say the President is lying....

After the Left has been accusing Sessions of same....and refusing to accept his explanation ..

Now they want his help? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Comey knows that the wire tapping was purely political and wants it clear that he had nothing to do with it and wasn't aware of it. He put the DOJ on the spot because that's who did it based upon Obama's instructions and everything was done under the table.

Our government conducts 100's of thousands polygraphs on citizens as year, it's time our government officials be ordered to take polygraphs. A fish rots first from the head.

RealJustme wrote:Comey knows that the wire tapping was purely political and wants it clear that he had nothing to do with it and wasn't aware of it. He put the DOJ on the spot because that's who did it based upon Obama's instructions and everything was done under the table.

Do you have any proof of that???

Trump can simply divulge the warrants and we will all know the truth...

:mrgreen:

So Elkin has no proof of Russian involvement?

johnforbes wrote:So Elkin has no proof of Russian involvement?

Russia investigation is just getting started!

Let's see what get drummed up........

:mrgreen:

elklindo69 wrote:

johnforbes wrote:So Elkin has no proof of Russian involvement?

Russia investigation is just getting started!

Let's see what get drummed up........

:mrgreen:

Oh I hope it does. Remember Ojackass saying he would more latitude after being re-elected