The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Just let a conservative do something similar and watch the libtards and the media go ape shit.

We watched the conservatives go ape shit when Obama did what W. Bush did, put his feet up on the historic furniture, and you're still going ape shit over it now. Why would you be surprised if they call you on your hypocrisy?
looks like G.W. Bush set the precedent. :o
http://www.snopes.com/politics/graphics/desk2.jpg

When the photos of Trump shuffling around the house in his bathrobe and slippers come out, then we'll see why your conservative handlers are feeding you this daily talking point today, Tool. :lol: :lol:

Another Obama estoppel!

Another Bush estoppel!

Bush came before Obama, you imbecile. :lol:

Snopes consists of one couple, both liberal.

One of them is from Canada.

Snopes is two liberals with opinions, nothing more.

A photograph is a photograph, johnny. It doesn't matter where you get it, you useless tool.
Who cares about Snopes? What do they have to do with whether W.Bush put his feet on the same desk?

But if you care so much about Snopes, then look at another source:
http://www.besha.me/oval-office-desk/pr ... ice-desk-k

Stop with your constant diversions from the topic already.
You sound like nothing more than a garden variety ignorant Trump supporter.

That photo of Bush was proven to be a photo shop, now don't you feel silly.

Thanks for the "alternate fact" RealTool. :lol:

Same thing with these photos? All photo shopped in Trump world?

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/or ... 5f8dab.jpg

http://www.whitehousemuseum.org/floor2/ ... m-2001.jpg

http://i0.wp.com/www.pbs.org/wgbh/front ... _j0070.jpg

So, a person with feet on the desk, he is a heel?

Same thing with these photos? All photo shopped in Trump world?

Yes, they were all photoshopped "after" photos of Obama with his feet on the desk came out. Some libtard even thought they were real and you still do. :lol: :lol: :lol:

The Demos complain about the Trumps and their money.....the media even attacked Melania for..
wearing a $9K+ dress last night....

If that's how the Left feels about dress then Adlai Stevenson would fit right in today....
but long ago, the Left told him no....twice! :o

The Obama administration funneled billions of dollars to activist organizations through a Department of Justice slush fund scheme, according to congressional investigators.

Findings spearheaded by the House Judiciary Committee point to a process shrouded in secrecy whereby monies were distributed to a labyrinth of nonprofit organizations involved with grass-roots activism.

Link, johnny?

There are a number on articles on this, from a variety of sources.

Just put "slush fund" and "DoJ" into a search engine.

By the way, I would oppose the Repubs doing any such thing too.

Along those lines, I opposed the nuclear option when Harry Reid did that, and I hope the Repubs don't do that for Gorsuch because it really would set a bad precedent.

Did you even bother to read this crap, johnny?

"“The underlying problem with the slush funds is we don’t know exactly where the money is going,” Ted Frank, director of The Competitive Enterprise Institute."-FOXnews

So you're upset about something they told you upfront they don't actually know about.
Right off you have allowed them to characterize the monies as a "slush fund" without any evidence.

"There is a recent effort by Republicans to eliminate the practice, which many believe was widely abused during the Obama administration."-FOXnews

They just admitted they have no evidence of abuse. But you're still parroting the "slush fund" characterization from FOXnews.
They only conveniently "believe" there is a problem. It's called "propaganda" johnny.

"“Advocates for big government and progressive power are using the Justice Department to extort money from corporations,” Judicial Watch’s Tom Fitton told Fox News. “It’s a shakedown. It’s corrupt, pure and simple.”"-FOXnews

"Advocates for big government and progressive power"? Seriously, johnny? :lol:
No, it's the Justice Department, dummy, and it will continue under Trump until the law is changed. You really need to learn to recognize propaganda for what it is, johnny. They're dragging you around by the nose.
Incidentally, the law WON'T be changed under Republicans, so why are they bringing it up? Doesn't that make you wonder?

"When big banks are sued by the government for discrimination or mortgage abuse, they can settle the cases by donating to third-party non-victims. The settlements do not specify how these third-party groups could use the windfall.
Critics say banks are incentivized to donate the funds to non-profits rather than giving it to consumers."-FOXnews

So they just told you it ISN'T a "slush fund" and you've still got your panties in a wad before you actually know there has been any abuse. That's what propaganda does; it manipulates you for someone else's purposes. They aren't your friends, johnny.

So here's what we know: there isn't actually a "slush fund", the money goes from banks to non-profits, so the government can't use it as a "slush fund", the banks choose who the they give the money to, not the government, and no-one yet knows if there has been any abuse, so FOXnews pretending there has by publishing this non-story is just dishonest.

The only thing I can agree in the article is that the money should go to Treasury, on principle.

Stop being such a tool, johnny.

By the way, I would oppose the Repubs doing any such thing too.

I wouldn't, it was acceptable then, it's acceptable now, conservatives need to start fighting fire with fire, if they bring a knife we need to bring a gun. Trump needs to flush the DOJ leadership of everyone appointed by Obama and then start up divisions within it to target those trying to undermine America's stability = Libtards.

Soros, Obama, the Clintons and others have built an Army of minions and billions in skimmed of tax money that they're preparing to use to under mine the conservative movement. Holder yesterday was bragging about it and called for their supporters to back their war because Obama will be leading it.