Re: With one question the media could sink Hillary
Posted: Mon Apr 20, 2015 2:09 pm
What other interpretation is there?
The Saudis didn't give 25 million for nothing.
The Saudis didn't give 25 million for nothing.
Amateur Housewives and girls next door meet and greet.
https://forums.voyeurweb.com/
RealJustme wrote:Bush lied thousands died.How'd ya like to have a pup outta one of these fuckers?One thing for sure is they come from a winning gene pool, never in our country's history has both a father and a son accomplished becoming President of the United States based soley upon their competence and proven leadership records.
RealJustme wrote:Elk, you're late to the game, Bush isn't running for President, Hillary is. So since you're so sure lies were told by politicians to start the war in Iraq, I take it you won't be supporting Hillary who as a Senator said she had seen convincing evidence Iraq had WMD and that as First Lady her husband had also uncovered evidence beyond a doubt Iraq had WMD and would use them again therefore must be stopped with force.Liar...
"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."This is close enough
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
sillydaddy wrote:There were no WMDs in Iraq."If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."This is close enough
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
Clinton never said there was evidence of WMDs.You're wrong as usual Clown, both Clintons did before Bush even became President, I'm sure they've tried to delete those statements as "private" but back then it wasn't on their own private server.