The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Barr was leaving office in weeks, and did no investigations beyond looking for coupons for deals on doughnuts.

He discouraged people from looking into any claims on the theory that it was mere sour grapes after a loss.

However, the facts are not what we wish or imagine them to be, but what they are, and as information leaked out it became clear that all of the key swing states violated their own election rules, and the 2020 election went down in history much as the Hayes-TIlden Stolen Election of 1876.

And Clownslacker was famous himself for going down during his tawdry tenure in Frisco.

By a show of hands....how many of you would like to see Ginni Thomas testify under oath in front of Congress on live national television (which obviously will not be broadcasted on Fox News) for 11 straight hours to explain why she thought it was a good idea for the wife of a S.C. Justice to try to overturn an election????

Come on, Elkin, you know that is not true.

The election was in November, there was Thanksgiving and Christmas, and Barr was out of office early the next year.

There were NOT comprehensive audits in 39 states, and saying such nonsense doesn't make it true.

The shame of this is that Dems should have WANTED full audits of all states to give this mess of an election some credibility.

Instead, the election mess of 2020 joins the Hayes-Tilden Stolen Election of 1876 in the history books.

I'm just wondering what we would find Ginni Thomas's laptop or mobile device, pray tell. OH wait.....but the emails. What about the emails???

Thomas sent emails to politicians in Arizona telling them, among other things.........to pick “a clean slate of electors.”

So Thomas got busted cold telling politicians that they needed to intervene because the voting was fraudulent or whatever. And that was the day after the election....as if an investigation was conducted where they had proof of fraud within 24 hours. This is just amateurish nonsense.

Think what would have happened if RBG's husband went out and tried to overthrow the election for Hillary? The radical right wing nuts would have burned Washington down to the ground.

No, the election was in November, Christmas and NY holidays intervened, and Barr was gone early the next year.

He discouraged investigations, and both parties did, including both RINOs and Dems on the Supreme Court which did not take the Texas case saying there was a judicially cognizable interest on the part of TX in whether all of the key swing states failed to follow their own election rules (and they did fail).

So Ginni Thomas was busted sending out multiple text messages to Mark Meadows telling his to help overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. That was crystal clear and undeniable.

"stand strong in the face of political and media pressure"

"power to fight back against fraud"

"ensure that a clean slate of Electors is chosen"

Yet no evidence has been produced by anybody of widespread election fraud. Not a single shred of evidence. Dozens and dozens of cases that have been brought up by Trump and his cronies have ALL FAILED.

Maybe you should try to get Biden impeached....but wait you would have to admit he's president.

What's wrong with having a clean slate of electors?

If you look at the history, Pence could have remanded the disputed electors to state legislatures for resolution pursuant to the Constitution, but of course he felt his function that day was just to rubberstamp.

Then the protesters outside did whatever they did, and there were apparently some agents or confidential informants, and they did whatever, and some cops let protesters in, and probably there were some genuinely weird events such as the wacko with Viking horns and then the cop who shot Ashli Babbitt dead with no warning shot, and we'll never probably be able to figure out all the nutty events that day unless Pelosi releases all the security video so we can find out what happened.

Then Democrats used it all for rhetorical and fundraising purposes.

"... Pence could have remanded the disputed electors to state legislatures for resolution..."-johnfibs

There were no "disputed electors". All the electors were duly chosen by legal authorities following the laws of each state. All the elections were certified. This is not disputed. The Vice President cannot simply choose to ignore the votes of legally appointed electors as you are pretending he can. He would need some evidence that there was a legal dispute. To this day there isn't any evidence to support a legal dispute. There are only unsupported partisan disputes otherwise known as 'sour grapes' because they've got no evidence of any fraud. All proponents of widespread fraud conspiracy theories have been laughed out of court because they refuse to present any evidence to the judges to support their claims.

Also, there were NO alternate slates of legally appointed electors sent to D.C.. And there was no uncertified election in any of those states that could have allowed the Vice President to ignore the votes of the appointed electors that were sent to D.C..

You keep listening to all these nutjob conspiracy theories that don't hold water, dimwit. The Vice President must follow the law. He can't arbitrarily decide he won't accept the votes of legally chosen electors. Even if two months later it was learned that some election results were fraudulent (so far not a single one has, all Republican run audits in those states have supported the results of their elections) the outcome of the Electoral College vote (i.e. Biden winning) would not have been altered unless all five swing state elections were shown to be fraudulent. One fraudulent election wouldn't have changed anything. Two wouldn't have changed anything. Three still wouldn't have changed anything. Biden would still have won. So you're wasting your time on this nonsense. It is up to authorities in each state to ensure that future elections are not subject to fraud. That's all anyone can do. The past elections are all audited and certified.

No one has, to this day, proven there was any widespread fraud in the elections ANYWHERE. Until you have some evidence there was, you're all just masturbating to your handlers' propaganda for the simple minded.

Have a little dignity, johnny. Stop being a clueless tool of your handlers. They are not your friends.

Of course, there were.

Every state in play appointed pro-Trump slates to preserve their rights; that was just the savvy thing to do.

Was there really any chance that Pence would look at the history and remand those slates of disputed electors to their states legislatures as the Constitution indicates could be done?

Probably not given Pence's wimpy nature, but that doesn't mean history and the Constitution show it was not possible.

johnny, fake lists of phony electors fabricated out of thin air by Trump clowns without the support of a single elected official in any state do not constitute legal alternate electors.

They are just lists of people's names without any legal standing. A phone book from each state would have the same legal standing and would be just as meaningful. They are not "alternate electors". When you have any list sent to D.C. by the governor of any disputed state, get back to us. It never happened. You made it up.

Now, when you can demonstrate that the elector votes counted by Pence were not from legally appointed electors appointed based on the certified election results, then let us know.

Otherwise, stop your impotent masturbation all over this forum. You're really messing up the place.

Clown, thanks for admitting the simple truth, which is that every key state assured that it had alternative slates of electors to preserve rights.

Pence could have looked at the history and remanded the disputed electors to state legislatures for resolution, and that would have been consistent with both historical precedent and the Constitution, although not surprisingly he viewed his function as that of a rubber stamp (the modern norm) rather than what history showed

johnny, sending a telephone book to D.C. does not constitute a list of "alternate electors".

None of them were appointed by the people with the power to appoint electors, so they have no standing under law. Even if the elections were shown to be fraudulent, the phony lists would carry no legal weight and would not be counted.

If lists have no basis in state election law, then they aren't lists of "alternate electors" (which is a nonsensical, meaningless term. No such term exists in any of the state election laws.)