Political discussions about everything
By Intrepid
#65325
Quoting the genius of Donkey-Rat Rep. Loretta Sanchez (California, where else?):

Listening to a liberal talk about firearms is like listening to a priest talk about a strip club – they just don’t have a clue.
That’s what happened when Congresswoman Loretta Sanchez (D-California) appeared on MSNBC and dropped this doozy:

“The reality is that Congress has been trying to get up some of these issues [relating to mental health] for the last five years, and we haven’t been able to,” she said

“We let the assault weapons ban, which was led by our senator Dianne Feinstein, we let that lapse. So you know, multi-automatic round weapons are easily available, even though not in California, but they can cross the state line, as you know,” Sanchez rambled.

Firearms come in many, many types – semi-automatic, fully automatic, single shot, bolt action, etc, etc – but never have I seen a “multi-automatic round weapon”.

But it sounds awesome. So, who wants to come up with a system that would meet that description? There’s clearly a demand for them.

Read more:http://controversialtimes.com/politics/ ... z3tYSa3uV5

And if that isn't enough, we also have to beware of something else that is new:
Now, we have a new term to add to the list of invented terms that is meant to frighten people and create a brand new set of assumptions – assault clothing.

The term emerged yesterday following the San Bernardino mass shooting.

Here are a few examples of its usage in the media. From Reuters:

By noon, according to police, the couple had donned assault clothing, armed themselves with rifles and stormed a holiday party attended by San Bernardino County employees, killing 14 people and wounding 17 others.

From ABC News/Associated Press:

Farook and Malik were found with assault rifles and semi-automatic handguns, and were wearing “assault-style clothing” with ammunition attached, authorities said.

From the LA Times:

Farook and Malik were dressed in what the chief called “assault-style clothing,” and both were armed with assault rifles and handguns.
Read more:http://controversialtimes.com/news/new- ... z3tYUAUqc3
#65370
The "journalists" describing "assault weapons" have no idea what they are babbling about.
What gets me are journalists and libtards labeling a rifle an "assault weapon" purely because it has a flash suppressor or pistol grip. To me it's not an assault rifle unless it's "fully" automatic not a libtards say "multi-automatic"
#65401
RealJustme wrote:
The "journalists" describing "assault weapons" have no idea what they are babbling about.
What gets me are journalists and libtards labeling a rifle an "assault weapon" purely because it has a flash suppressor or pistol grip. To me it's not an assault rifle unless it's "fully" automatic not a libtards say "multi-automatic"
Justme....

The M-16 does not fire "fully" automatic you dummy!

It has three selectors.

1. Safe

2. Single Shot

3. Three Round Burst.

:lol:

Fully automatic weapons are machine guns, SAW, etc...

As far as I am concerned, the AR-15, the civilian version of the M-4/M-16, is essentially a firearm that can be used in combat, period. I don't know...but are infantrymen going to be using hunting rifles in combat?
#65429
Justme....

The M-16 does not fire "fully" automatic you dummy!

It has three selectors.

1. Safe

2. Single Shot

3. Three Round Burst.

:lol:

Fully automatic weapons are machine guns, SAW, etc...

As far as I am concerned, the AR-15, the civilian version of the M-4/M-16, is essentially a firearm that can be used in combat, period. I don't know...but are infantrymen going to be using hunting rifles in combat?
First of all Clown, I never mention the M16, second if you're going to toss something out you need to get your fact correct. The M16 is indeed a fully automatic, the weapon you're describing is the M16A2.

As far as an AR15 being a weapon that can be used in combat, dude so can any rifle, an AR15 is a fine rifle but there are many fine files that aren't black that put it to shame. In fact I'd prefer to go into combat with my old Browning BAR .30-06, it's a semi-auto with the precision of a bolt action and with my scope the person with the AR15 would be hit with a 180-grain round before he got close enough to engage me with his AR15. It's not black so you libtards can't call it an assault weapon.
#65480
RealJustme wrote:
Justme....

The M-16 does not fire "fully" automatic you dummy!

It has three selectors.

1. Safe

2. Single Shot

3. Three Round Burst.

:lol:

Fully automatic weapons are machine guns, SAW, etc...

As far as I am concerned, the AR-15, the civilian version of the M-4/M-16, is essentially a firearm that can be used in combat, period. I don't know...but are infantrymen going to be using hunting rifles in combat?
First of all Clown, I never mention the M16, second if you're going to toss something out you need to get your fact correct. The M16 is indeed a fully automatic, the weapon you're describing is the M16A2.

As far as an AR15 being a weapon that can be used in combat, dude so can any rifle, an AR15 is a fine rifle but there are many fine files that aren't black that put it to shame. In fact I'd prefer to go into combat with my old Browning BAR .30-06, it's a semi-auto with the precision of a bolt action and with my scope the person with the AR15 would be hit with a 180-grain round before he got close enough to engage me with his AR15. It's not black so you libtards can't call it an assault weapon.
A rifle (M-16) that puts out only three rounds at a time is hardly a "fully automatic" weapon. A fully automatic weapon is one that continues firing while pulling on the trigger until the magazine is emptied out.

And no...I wouldn't go into combat with a Browning BAR .30-06. If you had any infantry training you would know why. You just don't know what you are talking about....
#65481
A rifle (M-16) that puts out only three rounds at a time is hardly a "fully automatic" weapon. A fully automatic weapon is one that continues firing while pulling on the trigger until the magazine is emptied out.
Now the Clown is arguing against the M16 as a combat weapon but insists an AR15 is one. :lol: :lol: :lol: So who told you the military doesn't use shotguns?
#65490
Elkindoofus, you incredible clueless moron, the military version, the original BAR (Browning Atomic Rifle) was the original squad automatic rifle. And a very effechive one at that. It was a crew served weapon that required an assistant to carry magazines. But it was heavy and kicked like hell. But when you shot somebody with it they stayed shot. This weapon was where the three shot burst came from. Although fully automatic, BAR gunners were trained to fire rolling three shot bursts to be able to control the weapon. Now you have learned something and aren't QUITE as stupid as when you started this bullshit.
#65562
RealJustme wrote:
A rifle (M-16) that puts out only three rounds at a time is hardly a "fully automatic" weapon. A fully automatic weapon is one that continues firing while pulling on the trigger until the magazine is emptied out.
Now the Clown is arguing against the M16 as a combat weapon but insists an AR15 is one. :lol: :lol: :lol: So who told you the military doesn't use shotguns?
The typical full of shit Justme retort. Go into Bizzaro Land and twist everything around the opposite way.

I never said that the military...doesn't use shotguns? Where did I say that?

:lol:
#65563
johnforbes wrote:Having actually turned the selector to rock 'n roll, one must note that Clownslacker has 3 actions too:

1) Dumb

2) Dumber

3) Dumbest
That's totally fucking lame!

Talk about someone has no game. I hope your pickup lines are not as bad...

LMAO

:lol:
Red state gun murder rate....

Heavens to Betsy*, "assumptions" tend to[…]

The problem is that, once a violent personality sl[…]

Big Beautiful Ballroom

Obama and his ilk started the project, so naturall[…]

Is there a bigger cuck piece of shit?

Green Energy

You Clean energy guys shot yourself in the foot, w[…]

Secret Slut

When I was dating my wife I discovered she had an […]