Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#120541
There is no "whistleblower."

This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.

1) He is a registered Democrat.

2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).

3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.

Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.

No quid, no quo.
By johnforbes
#120549
There is no "whistleblower."

This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.

1) He is a registered Democrat.

2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).

3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.

Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.

No quid, no quo.
By Clownkicker
#120557
johnforbes is too stupid to understand that his post contains nothing at all to "verify" that there was "No quid, no quo."

johnny's post doesn't even address the contents of the call. All he can do is make an irrelevant attack on the whistleblower for gathering intelligence and passing the intelligence on to authorities in accordance with the whistleblower law, as the IG reported.

Regardless, whether there was or was not a quid or a quo, we can all agree there was no "pro" involved in that phone call. That's what we get when we install an incompetent amateur in an important job.
By johnforbes
#120562
Clown should chew his cud over the plain fact that there is no quid and no quo.

There is no "whistleblower."

This person heard gossip, and has THREE aspects of bias.

1) He is a registered Democrat.

2) He favors a rival of Trump's (now identified as Biden).

3) A third unknown aspect of political bias per the IG.

Even if this person exists, and Schiff (a known liar) didn't make him up, his impression of the call from hearsay was totally wrong.

No quid, no quo.
Secret Slut

I looked up from cooking dinner to find my wife wa[…]