Political discussions about everything
By johnforbes
#116116
Ten days before a FISA warrant was even sought, the State Dept apparently informed the FBI that Steele was not a reliable informant because he hated Trump.

Steele asked State to circulate the fake dossier (paid for by Hillary) before the election, and thus obviously with an intent to influence the election against Trump.

Nevertheless, knowing all that, apparently they proceeded to use the fake dossier (and news stories on leftist outlets such as Mother Jones and Yahoo) as the main reasons for getting the FISA warrants.

Astounding corruption for partisan reasons.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#116119
Mueller was asked if his investigation covered possible Russian collusion by the DNC and Hillary in the election; he said it did not, because that would have been beyond the scope of his mandate.

There you have it my friends, the investigation was never about "Russian collusion in the election" it was ALL about finding something on Trump and resistance to his presidency.
By elklindo69
#116150
Do you Trumptards remember when Hillary was called to testify and she fought it and then agreed but only in private with limited topics and only for 2 hours?

No....of course you don't.

But I did remember when she sat in front of cameras for 11 hours and answered every question, because she's not the moronic son of Individual-1....
By johnforbes
#116219
Hillary's FBI "interview" was at a time and place of her convenience -- a Saturday over July 4th weekend.

It was not recorded, she was not under oath, not one single followup question was asked of her, and she had other interested pals of her sitting in.

Oh, and wasn't one of those asking "tough questions" her fellow Democrat Strzok?
User avatar
By RealJustme
#116222
Do you Trumptards remember when Hillary was called to testify and she fought it and then agreed but only in private with limited topics and only for 2 hours?
For the first time in the FBI's history, a suspect was interviewed (talked to) and not placed under oath and not recorded. There's not even a transcript of what the questions and answers were. It's one of the things Barr said he finds "extremely odd" and is investigating.
By johnforbes
#116232
What the press isn't saying is what it cannot say -- that obviously Obama knew all about the spying on Trump.

Strzok and Page's text said at one point that POTUS wanted to "know everything" and it seems almost inescapable that he did.
By elklindo69
#116236
So Johnnie..........please explain again how Obama and a bunch of lifelong Republicans in the FBI conspired with Hillary to spy on Trump's campaign so that Hillary would lose her own election so then the deep state could take Trump down because holy fucking shit that makes perfect sense to me.

OH but wait....the fucking emails.
By johnforbes
#116239
Elkin, stop a moment, pause your mania and ask yourself a serious question:

Would it now be okay for Trump's IRS to target Democrat groups?

Would it now be okay for Trump's FBI and DoJ to use a fake dossier on the upcoming Democrat candidate, and use that fake dossier to wiretap him/her?

Stop a moment and try to understand how wrong that would be, and why I would NEVER want such a disgraceful thing to happen to the next Democrat to seek the presidency.

Slip your IQ into a higher gear and try to comprehend that I'm not just talking about the current president and how wrong it was to wiretap his campaign, spy on it, and use a fake dossier against it.
By elklindo69
#116246
Modern conservatism is nothing more than a race to see who can be the cruelest piece of shit...

Some GOP politician in Missouri said there was "consensual rape."

Does that also mean there is "consensual robbery" or "consensual murder."

Johnnie at what point do you get tired of being governed by these fucking morons?
By johnforbes
#116262
At what point do I get tired?

Good question.

I've only been online now for 72 consecutive years, and yet I feel as fresh as a daisy.

Elkin, stop a moment, pause your mania and ask yourself a serious question:

Would it now be okay for Trump's IRS to target Democrat groups?

Would it now be okay for Trump's FBI and DoJ to use a fake dossier on the upcoming Democrat candidate, and use that fake dossier to wiretap him/her?

Stop a moment and try to understand how wrong that would be, and why I would NEVER want such a disgraceful thing to happen to the next Democrat to seek the presidency.

Slip your IQ into a higher gear and try to comprehend that I'm not just talking about the current president and how wrong it was to wiretap his campaign, spy on it, and use a fake dossier against it.
By Clownkicker
#116264
"Slip your IQ into a higher gear and try to comprehend that I'm not just talking about the current president and how wrong it was to wiretap his campaign, spy on it, and use a fake dossier against it."-johnfibs

Of course you are, johnny, and that's the point.

Not once did you ever criticize Republicans and conservatives for attacking Obama with lies and dirty tricks. You supported the "birther" bullshit. You support the bullshit about Obama being gay. You support the bullshit about Michelle being a man. You supproted EVERY SINGLE THING that the sites like Infowars and Alex Jones posted about Obama.

And now you are supporting an Administration that is refusing to comply with a legal, Constitutional Congressional subpoena.

That is the proof that your phony 'outrage' is just partisan posturing.
By johnforbes
#116285
And yet you supported Hillary when she responded to a subpoena by deleting 33,000 emails and then using BleachBit on the server.

Physician, heal thyself!
By Clownkicker
#116288
And yet you resort to another lie about me instead of facing your own hypocrisy.

I have never supported Hillary in anything having to do with the Republican private server systems.

When Dick Cheney first started the practice of putting government communications on private servers, you never said a thing, yet you criticized Hillary for doing what Republicans had been doing.

And now you once again criticize what Hilary did and overlook entirely what Trump is doing, which is far worse and far more dangerous to our Republic. Refusing to comply with a Congressional subpoena means you support an executive who has no oversight. In other word, you support a dictatorship. That's horrible, but it's what conservatives do.

What I can't stomach personally is you lying about me supporting Hillary for having a private server. I didn't.

It never happened. You made it up. It's the only thing conservatives ever have: made up stupid shit.
By johnforbes
#116293
I doubt if Cheney was the first one, but it is simply wrong for a number of reasons.

First, Hillary's email -- or the email of any federal employee -- belongs to the taxpayers to the extent that it is work-related.

Second, it is simply sloppy to use a private server for business relating to the Sec of State, and apparently Obama emailed her on that system too.

How could any person who takes national security seriously do that?

That applies to Cheney or Hillary or anybody.
User avatar
By RealJustme
#116294
please explain again how Obama and a bunch of lifelong Republicans in the FBI conspired with Hillary to spy on Trump's campaign so that Hillary would lose her own election so then the deep state could take Trump down because holy fucking shit that makes perfect sense to me
Since you have to have sense, to make sense of something, it only makes sense you can't make sense of it.
By elklindo69
#116340
So Trump is the most transparent president that...

Pays hush money to porn stars.
Didn’t interview with Mueller.
Hides his tax returns.
Orders witnesses to defy subpoenas.
Won’t release full Mueller report which exonerates him.
Claims executive privilege on everything.
8th Amendment

Well , if Trump over-valued his properties .... an[…]

Committee Suppressed

AGAIN AGAIN, what johnforbes is trying to say once[…]

See? I told you johnforbes had no justification fo[…]

After Stewart slammed Trump, which showed Stewart […]

The Best Man for the Job?

Surprisingly, Scientific American has leaned to th[…]

Mr Forbes does have the strength of a machine. An[…]

Had Kamala been an apple/tomato/cherry/peach pick[…]

8th Amendment

We have all been wondering, in the context of the […]