Political discussions about everything
By elklindo69
#110320
Looks as if it didn't take very long for the charlatans in the WH to doctor the video from the press confrence the other day...

:lol: :mrgreen: :lol: :mrgreen: :lol:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_cont ... 84hzrFkSyU

A video shared by White House press secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders showing an incident involving CNN reporter Jim Acosta and a White House intern contains extra frames that do not appear in the C-SPAN broadcast of the event.

Acosta had his White House press credentials revoked after questioning President Donald Trump about the migrant caravan. Sanders later justified the ban by tweeting that Acosta had placed “his hands on a young woman just trying to do her job as a White House intern.”

Sanders then tweeted a video showing the incident, based on the C-SPAN coverage. However, according to an analysis of that video by Storyful, it has several frames repeated. These frames do not appear in the original C-SPAN footage, and appear to exaggerate the action of Acosta. The video shared by Sanders appeared under an hour after the same video, with the same close-up, was posted by Infowars.com contributor Paul Joseph Watson.

ANALYSIS

The video was posted using interlaced frames, rather than C-SPAN’s progressive frames, so cannot be made to match up exactly with the original footage. However, when compared side-by-side, there is a clear moment (Frames 13, 14, 15 in our first clip, where the C-SPAN version is on the left) when the Sanders video halts and the C-SPAN footage does not. The two clips, which were roughly in sync before that moment, are out of sync thereafter.

The same three still frames are repeated in the zoomed-in clips of the incident posted in the Sanders video.

Both the C-SPAN video and the footage posted by Sanders was set to play at 29.7 frames, as was the software suite we used to do this analysis, eliminating the possibility that the error was caused when the footage was imported into editing software by Storyful.

Watson said of allegations that his video was doctored: “The video was not ‘doctored’ by me — all I did was zoom in on the original from the Daily Wire. I did not ‘speed up’ anything. The screenshot from Sony Vegas Pro here proves that.”
By johnforbes
#110327
In the video I saw, Acosta lifted the girl up over his head, whirled her around, and then body-slammed her to the carpet of the pressroom.

As a victim, she is noble.
By sillydaddy
#110330
As I understand it , the whole thing was being televised live..... :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Every network and every TV station across the country has access to a video of it and there were witnesses present.
So "doctoring up" one copy makes no sense..!

Elk..you're such an gullible idiot..!


I hope the WH bans Acosta for life...! :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
By elklindo69
#110332
I dunno Silly...does anything the Trump administration ever do make any sense? You should know better by now....LMFAO!

Didn't Donnie Jr. get busted cold doctoring his father's approval ratings?

OMG...you people are just incredibly dumb...........

:lol:

Now independent experts are saying that the WH video was doctored!!!

NEW YORK (AP) — A video distributed by the Trump administration to support its argument for banning CNN reporter Jim Acosta from the White House appears to have been doctored to make Acosta look more aggressive than he was during an exchange with a White House intern, an independent expert said Thursday.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders tweeted the video, which shows Acosta asking President Donald Trump a question on Wednesday as the intern tries to take his microphone away. But a frame-by-frame comparison with an Associated Press video of the same incident shows that the one tweeted by Sanders appears to have been altered to speed up Acosta’s arm movement as he touches the intern’s arm, according to Abba Shapiro, an independent video producer who examined the footage at AP’s request.

Earlier, Shapiro noticed that frames in the tweeted video were frozen to slow down the action, allowing it to run the same length as the AP one.

The alteration is “too precise to be an accident,” said Shapiro, who trains instructors to use video editing software.

The tweeted video also does not have any audio, which Shapiro said would make it easier to alter. It’s also unlikely the differences could be explained by technical glitches or by video compression — a reduction in a video’s size to enable it to play more smoothly on some sites — because the slowing of the video and the acceleration that followed are “too precise to be an accident.
User avatar
By namngulfvet
#110343
elklindo69 wrote:I dunno Silly...does anything the Trump administration ever do make any sense? You should know better by now....LMFAO!

Didn't Donnie Jr. get busted cold doctoring his father's approval ratings?

OMG...you people are just incredibly dumb...........

:lol:

Now independent experts are saying that the WH video was doctored!!!

NEW YORK (AP) — A video distributed by the Trump administration to support its argument for banning CNN reporter Jim Acosta from the White House appears to have been doctored to make Acosta look more aggressive than he was during an exchange with a White House intern, an independent expert said Thursday.

White House press secretary Sarah Sanders tweeted the video, which shows Acosta asking President Donald Trump a question on Wednesday as the intern tries to take his microphone away. But a frame-by-frame comparison with an Associated Press video of the same incident shows that the one tweeted by Sanders appears to have been altered to speed up Acosta’s arm movement as he touches the intern’s arm, according to Abba Shapiro, an independent video producer who examined the footage at AP’s request.

Earlier, Shapiro noticed that frames in the tweeted video were frozen to slow down the action, allowing it to run the same length as the AP one.

The alteration is “too precise to be an accident,” said Shapiro, who trains instructors to use video editing software.

The tweeted video also does not have any audio, which Shapiro said would make it easier to alter. It’s also unlikely the differences could be explained by technical glitches or by video compression — a reduction in a video’s size to enable it to play more smoothly on some sites — because the slowing of the video and the acceleration that followed are “too precise to be an accident.
As usual he deflects from the subject when shown hes an Idiot
By johnforbes
#110344
Having been a video club member long ago, I am more of an expert on videos than some leftist chosen by the Trump-hating Associated Press.

As I examine the footage, Acosta grabs the gal, lifts her overhead, and whirls her more than the typical helicopter prop.
By elklindo69
#110378
There is a simple reason why people know the White House video was doctored...

It has no fucking sound!!!

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
By RealJustme
#110457
Come on John....the video was doctored. Just admit it.
We all saw what happened, Acosta's claim he never touched her if plain false, first he blocked her then he pushed her arm away. Even CNN's video shows it. Man handling a young female intern is not acceptable. CNN claims they will be suing, when Trump was told he just smiled and said "if so, they just opened the door, looking forward to a video showing he didn't touch her as they claim." :D
Committee Suppressed

AND YET AGAIN what johnforbes is trying to say is […]

johnny, your old partisan song and dance is not &q[…]

8th Amendment

Geezus, sillydummy, inform yourself already. Trum[…]

The Engoron theory was utter nonsense and the enti[…]

The Best Man for the Job?

Surprisingly, Scientific American has leaned to th[…]

Mr Forbes does have the strength of a machine. An[…]

Had Kamala been an apple/tomato/cherry/peach pick[…]

8th Amendment

We have all been wondering, in the context of the […]