Political discussions about everything
#97159
What was Mueller thinking?

Surely he had to know, as a long-time investigator, that Strzok was pro-Democrat and biased?

Surely he had to know, or be informed, that Strzok was having an affair and texting political messages to another of Mueller's staffers?

Surely Mueller had to know that 9 of his 17 lawyers had donated to Democrats and were biased?

Why undermine the crediblity of his own inquiry by hiring partisan Democrats?
#97170
sillydaddy wrote:
Why undermine the crediblity of his own inquiry by hiring partisan Democrats?
Because he's a Democrat...
No one anywhere ever said Democrats were smart. this is going to blow a hole bunch of holes in several cases that well need to be investigated :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
#97183
When acting Attny Gen Sally Yates refused to enforce Trump's first travel ban, he fired her on January 30, 2017.

Weissmann, who is now working with Mueller to investigate Trump, emailed Yates in January saying he was "so proud" of her for defying Trump.

So now we have Weissmann joining Strzok as two of Mueller's main staffers and both of them were anti-Trump when they SHOULD HAVE BEEN NEUTRAL.

Lying on a loan application is fraud. Trump lied o[…]

Committee Suppressed

AND YET AGAIN what johnforbes is trying to say is […]

johnny, your old partisan song and dance is not &q[…]

8th Amendment

Geezus, sillydummy, inform yourself already. Trum[…]

The Best Man for the Job?

Surprisingly, Scientific American has leaned to th[…]

Mr Forbes does have the strength of a machine. An[…]

Had Kamala been an apple/tomato/cherry/peach pick[…]

8th Amendment

We have all been wondering, in the context of the […]