[Clownkicker]

Former Federal Judge J. Michael Luttig has something to say to Trump supporters with their fingers in their ears and whining "La-la-la-la-la-la-la...."

This article contains a video clip of interview with the Judge himself telling you why Trump really is a legitimate threat to America, the Constitution, and democracy. It's not just "Democrats" or "liberals" or fictional child molesters in Pizza Parlor basements saying these things. But don't take my word for it. Listen to a Right Wing conservative tell you himself (time stamp 3:55 to the end):
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... 8e08&ei=70

[johnforbes]

That guy is hardly Right Wing, but then of course neither is the fabulous Forbes.

He is entitled to his opinion, but seems like a garden variety Trump hater much like Clowntroller himself.

Hating a transitory politician is not healthy.

[Clownkicker]

"Hating a transitory politician is not healthy."-Hypocritejohnny

And yet you start thread after mindless thread about "the Biden crime family" while ignoring the Trump Crime family, clearly demonstrating your hate for Biden, a transitory politician.

But I must say, your awareness that your hate for Biden is not healthy is encouraging.

[johnforbes]

Heavens, I don't hate them at all.

The kids were all drug addicts, weren't they? At least H and pathetic Ashley.

And what is more mundane than a career politician making little money but who has a taste for the high life -- mansions and money?

So how did they make 17 million during 2017 to 2019?

The sole product the family had for sale was access to power.

[Clownkicker]

"So how did they make 17 million during 2017 to 2019?"-johnflubs

I already gave you a link the the Forbes article explaining where the Bidens got the money, dimwit. And none of it was from access to power. It was all legitimate as far as it is legal and every Republican does the same thing. If you think the Bidens were corrupt to do what they did when out of office, then you are saying all those Republicans are also corrupt for doing the same legal things.

Can't you read above a sixth grade level, dummy?

[johnforbes]

But there were over 170 Suspicious Activity Reports generated by Treasury.

And apparently about 20 LLCs.

My extended family has a few LLCs, but not 20, and no income from foreign business endeavors -- particularly over which some relative has power.

Isn't this just ordinary boring old corruption of the sort which Democrats (and those of other partisan affiliations) have practiced since time immemorial?

[Clownkicker]

You don't know any more than any other Republican knows, dummy.

But you are here on a daily basis starting thread after useless thread pretending you know Biden has committed some crimes.

But you don't know. After four years you still have no more evidence of any crime committed by Joe than you have evidence of widespread election fraud.

Innuendo is all you have. And innuendo is not evidence in court, dimwit.

[Clownkicker]

Time to hear from two more conservative law professors who can't be shrugged off on this issue either (plus a bonus conservative Yale law professor's opinion. We know how johnforbes values that.)


"WASHINGTON — Two prominent conservative law professors have concluded that Donald Trump is ineligible to be president under a provision of the Constitution that bars people who have engaged in an insurrection from holding government office. The professors are active members of the Federalist Society, the conservative legal group, and proponents of originalism, the method of interpretation that seeks to determine the Constitution’s original meaning.

The professors — William Baude of the University of Chicago and Michael Stokes Paulsen of the University of St. Thomas — studied the question for more than a year and detailed their findings in a long article to be published next year in The University of Pennsylvania Law Review.

“When we started out, neither of us was sure what the answer was,” Baude said. “People were talking about this provision of the Constitution. We thought: ‘We’re constitutional scholars, and this is an important constitutional question. We ought to figure out what’s really going on here.’ And the more we dug into it, the more we realized that we had something to add.”

He summarized the article’s conclusion: “Donald Trump cannot be president — cannot run for president, cannot become president, cannot hold office — unless two-thirds of Congress decides to grant him amnesty for his conduct on Jan. 6.”

"There is, the article said, “abundant evidence” that Trump engaged in an insurrection, including by setting out to overturn the result of the 2020 presidential election, trying to alter vote counts by fraud and intimidation, encouraging bogus slates of competing electors, pressuring the vice president to violate the Constitution, calling for the march on the Capitol and remaining silent for hours during the attack itself."

"Steven G. Calabresi, a law professor at Northwestern University and Yale University and a founder of the Federalist Society, called the article “a tour de force.”-Seattle Trimes

Things are looking bad for Trump when the most conservative of Republicans are now disqualifying him from office.

[johnforbes]

Actually the Federalist Society can be shrugged off as RINOs.

Saying a bunch of unarmed folks wandering around taking selfies was some sort of uprising, come on man...