Page 1 of 1

Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:01 am
by johnforbes
So far, no journalist has been smart enough to ask: How many shell casings were in the hotel room -- enough to cause the carnage outside with a single shooter theory?

Also, has anybody listened to the audio of the massacre? Doesn't the sound remind you of an M240 belt-fed?

Was there a belt-fed 7.62mm somewhere in addition to the often cited bump stock AR?

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:22 am
by Intrepid
Those who know about such things say the firing was too continuous to be a bump fire weapon. The very process of firing a bump fire produces some erratic bursts.

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 10:41 am
by johnforbes
Yeah, the whole thing about a tripod and a scope, what sense would that make if one were "bumping" the weapon?

My first thought, on hearing some of the audio, was that one of the weapons had to be belt-fed.

If you listen to audio of the M240 on some Youtube account or elsewhere, it sounds identical to some of the Vegas audio, doesn't it?

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:05 pm
by Intrepid
This just in:
Ever since the brutal massacre took place in Las Vegas on Sunday night after a deranged psychopath opened fire on concert goers, it’s been extremely difficult to get a straight story from the media. Many experts are crying foul over the media’s narrative that there was only one shooter, including the Las Vegas sheriff who says it was “impossible” and a former Navy SEAL who said in a recent interview that the official story “does not add up.” Now what we’ve been speculating since the shooting took place has just been confirmed, after breaking news reveals that a second shooter has just been arrested for the Las Vegas massacre.

According to breaking news from CNN, Mandalay Bay security guard Jesus Compos has just been arrested by Las Vegas authorities as being the second shooter in the massacre that took the lives of 59 and injured more than 500 others. CNN reported:

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Sun Oct 15, 2017 8:29 pm
by Clownkicker
To give you some idea of how gullible the AssClown Insipid really is, his "This just in" story is right wing conspiracy fake news for the tragically stupid. Even Fox news won't touch it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What a fucking loser boy. He'll swallow any old shit without checking the facts. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

But keep dancing for me, Turd Boy. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 12:06 am
by Intrepid
Careful fudge packer or I'll send you running (or rolling woukd be more accurate) back to your libtard safe space.

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Mon Oct 16, 2017 6:00 am
by namngulfvet
Clownkicker wrote:To give you some idea of how gullible the AssClown Insipid really is, his "This just in" story is right wing conspiracy fake news for the tragically stupid. Even Fox news won't touch it. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

What a fucking loser boy. He'll swallow any old shit without checking the facts. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

But keep dancing for me, Turd Boy. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Thanks for admitting you have your head up Ojackasses asshole so far your cant see daylight

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 6:59 am
by johnforbes
Weird thing about this Vegas case is that any person who doesn't accept the official story (no terrorism, acted alone) is dubbed a "conspiracy theorist."

But the official story was announced BEFORE any investigation -- BEFORE, not AFTER.

And all people want are facts, such as how many empty shell cases were counted and photographed in the hotel suite?

Enough to have a single shooter even do the damage outside?

What are the basic facts?

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 1:31 pm
by Intrepid
Well, Compos is still MIA, and a woman who was there that night and was vocally critical of the lone gunman narrative has been found dead under unusual circumstances.

Make of that what you will.

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 3:08 pm
by johnforbes
Whatever the truth, people will have to decide for themselves because the official story makes not the slightest bit of sense.

Perhaps Paddock (an accountant and pilot) was running guns, and maybe he used the pretext of gambling to launder his gun income.

Does anybody make millions playing video poker?

If they did, wouldn't they be banned from casinos?

The whole millions-from-gambling tale didn't hold water either.

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:16 pm
by Clownkicker
"The whole millions-from-gambling tale didn't hold water either."-johnflubs

Maybe that's because you made it up and you're the only one telling that ridiculous story about winning millions at video poker.

Might I suggest reading a news site that isn't one of your wacky conspiracy theory nut job sites?

Re: Vegas Theory? Part II

Posted: Tue Oct 17, 2017 4:26 pm
by johnforbes
As stated, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, nor do I visit such sites.

My interest is FACTS, such as whether there's enough brass in the hotel room to permit a single shooter to have caused the carnage below.

Paddock owned an apartment building, then sold that with a partner apparently and they split 8 m, and he apparently gambled large amounts on video poker.

But people who gamble tend to end up with LESS money, not more.

An accountant would have understood money laundering.

Is this a conspiracy theory?

No, it is merely one possible hypothesis which would certainly better explain the tragedy than a lone shooter millionaire gambler hauling 23 weapons to his hotel room.