The Amateur Message Boards of the World Famous VoyeurWeb

Good work, Dude.

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/loca ... story.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Why, that guy isn't any older than Jared Kushner.

Mere coincidence, johnny? :o

So everybody the same age is the same?

On a more positive note, Clowntoker's age, IQ, and waist are all the same number -- 57.

But I thought moronic non sequitur innuendo is all anyone needs around here, johnny.

It's all you ever post.

"Schock said he made honest mistakes and that no one ever intended to break the law."

Ahh, the old "ignorance of the law" defense. That should go over well in court, right, johnny?



"Unlike some politicians, I did not delete any emails, nor did my staff smash or destroy any electronic devices."

So I guess he's really screwed.

If some legislator breaks the law, he can take the consequences.

The real question is why Holder, Lynch, and now Sessions have not dug into the corruption of the Clinton Foundation.

They did.....and they found the accusations to be unwarranted.

This asshole belongs in jail....He's a crook.
What made he think he was special and above the LAW?
The answer is simple .....He's a faggot!
They have their own separate rights, you know! :o :lol: :lol:

When did Holder, Lynch, or Sessions do an investigation of the corruption of the Clinton Foundation?

Never.

There was no evidence that an investigation was called for. None. You're just dreaming.

My comments here are nonpartisan.

When you have a foundation created by a former and a potential president, it is selling access.

A huge percentage of the people Hillary saw as Sec of State were -- guess what? -- donors to the Clinton Foundation.

Even George Suckonupwithus, the "journalist," contributed so he could have access.

It is the biggest example of public corruption in US history, and Holder and Lynch didn't look into it.

That is nowhere near "nonpartisan".

And that is no necessarily "corruption". How it's used could be, but audits would clearly show whether it is or not.

Of course, my comments were nonpartisan.

I wouldn't want any Repub to run a foundation and have to serve as a pay-for-access scheme with the president's wife planning a future presidential run.

Bill got speech money in exchange for the uranium deal and many others.

This stands as the most massive and obvious example of public corruption in U.S. history.

Makes Teapot Dome look tiny and silly.

And tRumpf doesn't have a foundation. And he hasn't funneled off any charity money to himself. And........

....And yet he keeps on winning! :lol: :lol: :lol:

You really believe that's "winning"?? Really??

Dogzilla wrote:You really believe that's "winning"?? Really??

You wouldnt know a win if slapped you in your little snowflake kisser...Dogshit

The real question is why Holder, Lynch, and now Sessions have not dug into the corruption of the Clinton Foundation.

I have it high authority Sessions and a team are doing just that but to avoid outcries are waiting until they're ready to read the indictments along with the evidence to announce it.

Hold your breath, Sweetie.