Welcome Anonymous, It is currently Fri Nov 17, 2017 12:20 pm
     

FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Discuss and interact with contributors and members about Nude In Public.

FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby traegicomix » Fri Feb 20, 2015 9:55 am

The recent contri from FreshmanSue is a fraud: http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ay-Goodbye

Most of the pictures are the same as in her September contri (http://www.funbags.com/contributions/vi ... t-the-park). But even worse: Picture #4 is exactly the same as in the September contest – only having photoshoped the people in the background.

Her contri in this month is obviously not NIP. In our opinion she should be disqualified and banned from VW since this is a fraud attempt which is not acceptable!!!!!!!
Attachments
FreshmanSue.PNG
Left one from 02/2015 (with people in the background), right one from 09/2014 (without people in the background)
traegicomix
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2014 1:04 pm

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby kherott » Fri Feb 20, 2015 10:49 pm

yes fraud !!
kherott
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Feb 28, 2013 11:28 pm

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby Intrepid » Sun Feb 22, 2015 7:57 am

She (or her photographer) has made no secret that she/they are upset that she hasn't won any money. Perhaps spreading it around to various categories is their way of increasing the odds of winning.
Intrepid
 
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:05 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby Ina » Mon Feb 23, 2015 10:09 am

Don't understand this point:

Intrepid wrote:She (or her photographer) has made no secret that she/they are upset that she hasn't won any money. Perhaps spreading it around to various categories is their way of increasing the odds of winning.


Actually her current contri is on rank #1 and she will win 1,250 USD if VW does not react on our complaints!

Don't understand why VW is not responding to this thread :(
Ina
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:14 am

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby JockStrap » Mon Feb 23, 2015 3:02 pm

The recent picture was obviously taken at the same shoot as the other, but it is not necessarily fraud. The photographer could have taken a set of photos using rapid successive exposures while the model held the pose, the people in the background may have walked into the picture. Saying they were photo shopped in is going too far.

I have seen many posts made over successive months using photos that were obviously taken at the same session.

People have made rude comments to the model, and I can understand her statement about pulling out. Unfortunately many here did not have the same Grandmother as I had, otherwise they would know, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all".

Making a derogatory comment in another contribution, to avoid automatic removal, I presume, is just a low act. So low in fact that I'm tempted to state, traegicomix, that your behaviour is lower than a snakes belly, but I won't because of what my Grandmother taught me, consider yourself reprimanded, traegicomix.

Those who post here are all very brave, and should be congratulated for this, not castigated because they do not look like the commenter believes they should look.

Hats off to all contributors. Knickers off if you like. Hope to see more of you FreshmanSue.
Vidi masturbari veni (I saw, I wanked, I came.)
JockStrap
 
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 8:26 pm

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby rockclimber » Thu Feb 26, 2015 10:37 pm

JockStrap wrote:The recent picture was obviously taken at the same shoot as the other, but it is not necessarily fraud. The photographer could have taken a set of photos using rapid successive exposures while the model held the pose, the people in the background may have walked into the picture. Saying they were photo shopped in is going too far.

I have seen many posts made over successive months using photos that were obviously taken at the same session.

People have made rude comments to the model, and I can understand her statement about pulling out. Unfortunately many here did not have the same Grandmother as I had, otherwise they would know, "If you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all".

Making a derogatory comment in another contribution, to avoid automatic removal, I presume, is just a low act. So low in fact that I'm tempted to state, traegicomix, that your behaviour is lower than a snakes belly, but I won't because of what my Grandmother taught me, consider yourself reprimanded, traegicomix.

Those who post here are all very brave, and should be congratulated for this, not castigated because they do not look like the commenter believes they should look.

Hats off to all contributors. Knickers off if you like. Hope to see more of you FreshmanSue.


Well said. I can shoot twenty frame bursts easily. Having people walk in frame isn't surprising in a public place.

SUE,

Keep posting, you brighten our days and remind us Spring is around the corner.....

"I would like a lifetime spent,
With an irrational and suspicious goddess,
Some short tempered jealousy on the side...
And a bottle of wine that tastes like you...
... and a glass that's never empty...."

User avatar
rockclimber
 
Posts: 1378
Images: 9
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:37 am

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby Intrepid » Sat Feb 28, 2015 10:05 am

Actually her current contri is on rank #1 and she will win 1,250 USD if VW does not react on our complaints!


Yes, but in previous contributions she, or her photographer complained that they hadn't won any money, yet. Kind of colors the reaction to her nude contributions...but not badly enough to dismiss her.

I agree she is a beautiful girl, a body that is built for comfort rather that speed (which is my preference), and brave enough to pose fully nude, in public. I would hate to see her go away. Perhaps if she wins this month, it will be enough to convince her to continue. However, is money the proper motivation for posting, or should it be the joy of being naked and sharing yourself? Or should we ignore the financial part of the process and just enjoy the beauty?
Intrepid
 
Posts: 4120
Joined: Wed Nov 06, 2013 2:05 pm
Location: U.S.

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby Jbe » Sat Feb 28, 2015 11:28 am

Whether this is a fraud or not, she seemed to have accomplished her "goal". Sue has one of the highest scores (currently 4.803) that I have ever seen... and the most comments (currently 882) on a contri I have ever seen here. BUT... I did not see that she responded to a single comment... and from the several times I have checked her other contris, she has never responded- though I could be wrong.

Yes, she is an absolutely gorgeous woman with a body the gods themselves wish they had. But if a contributor doesn't take the time to express her thanks and appreciation to her fans- but whines instead about not winning any money, that person loses any support from me. That says to me they are only here for the money. And that makes that person very unattractive to me.

But everybody has their own opinion. Ok... I'm going back into my cave.
User avatar
Jbe
 
Posts: 1702
Images: 0
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:26 am
Location: Inland Empire, Southern California

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby BabyCakes » Sat Feb 28, 2015 7:39 pm

Actually, as much as I LOVE Sue, some of these pictures are the exact same pictures as the DDD's at the Park post that's now on FunBags. They just look slightly edited compared to the first post. Although, not all pictures are the same. Looks like they added some to this contri that they didn't post in the last and they have other ones in the last that they didn't add to this one. Either way, still a beautiful woman, but I agree with John. Only posting on VW for the money...kinda takes the fun out of posting, in my opinion. I also don't exactly like the part on the description that says that they were taken on valentines day either, if they weren't, but oh well. All that being said, I LOVE Sue and have been a fan since I first came across her posts, I really hope that she continues!
User avatar
BabyCakes
 
Posts: 113
Images: 0
Joined: Fri Dec 12, 2014 10:28 pm

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby Ina » Sun Mar 01, 2015 11:05 am

JockStrap wrote:The recent picture was obviously taken at the same shoot as the other, but it is not necessarily fraud. The photographer could have taken a set of photos using rapid successive exposures while the model held the pose, the people in the background may have walked into the picture. Saying they were photo shopped in is going too far.


If you were a photographer or a model you would know that it is NOT possible to take two identical pictures at all. When you take a look at Sue's picture from this thread you can see that the following things are exactly the same on both pics:
- the pose
- the expression in her face
- the eyes
- the hair
- the mouth
- hand and finger position
- ...
It is NOT possible to take two pictures where all these facts are identical!!! In nature you always have wind that changes your hair between two pictures. A model cannot hold her face expression exactly the same. And so on ...

So, for me it is definitely a fake!!!
Ina
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:14 am

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby CharlesConleyV » Thu Mar 05, 2015 2:06 pm

good photo :D
CharlesConleyV
 
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:46 pm

Re: FreshmanSue: FRAUD!!!

Postby TN2Willy » Fri May 08, 2015 8:31 am

I don't care, we both think she is stunning!!!
User avatar
TN2Willy
 
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:28 am


Return to Nude In Public

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Who is online

In total there are 3 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 5 minutes)
Most users ever online was 140 on Wed Oct 11, 2017 3:15 am

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

Info

The team
Delete all board cookies
Delete style cookies
• All times are UTC - 8 hours [ DST ]
RocketTheme Joomla Templates