Page 1 of 1

Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Sat Jun 22, 2013 3:32 pm
by Ina69x
Hi guys,

Although I'm an open-minded girl I'm wondering why "sexy" (???) Veronik has such a good rating? In my opinion she doesn't look very happy and has floppy boobs.

I agree that the quality of the pics is very good, but ...

Maybe you guys can tell me? Would appreciate any feedback :)

Thanks,
Ina

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Sun Jun 23, 2013 10:28 am
by Jbe
Ina, since you asked... and it's only my opinion...

She is a very pretty lady and the photo work is quite nice. Not everybody likes silicon and some people like more natural boobs even if they don't stand up on a woman's chest and wave at everybody. :roll:

She does have some interaction with her fans and that always helps with scores. IMHO one of the biggest reasons she does well in the scoring is that she shows a lot of pussy shots. A lot of people come here simply for that. If a woman doesn't show the goods between her legs then she often tends to get lower scores. A lot of people don't care for the more artistic shots... the classier shots (not saying Veronik's aren't)... They want the clam shots and Veronik provides.

I agree with you in regards to her expressions. She doesn't seem to exhibit a wide range of emotions in her shoots. I would enjoy her pics more if perhaps she did smile more or looked like she was enjoying herself. But maybe she is just going for the sultry look. Whatever the reason, it hasn't seemed to hurt her scores.

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Wed Jun 26, 2013 3:10 pm
by SweetLisa
I think she is very pretty. Jbe is right, though. It wouldn't hurt her to smile once in a while. But she must be doing something right. The proof is in her rating.

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:39 am
by Elise
I agree with the guys here. Veronik is a lovely beauty, which shows from her score.

From Veronik's initial post the photography work, settings, poses, etc.. were always very well done. Kudos to them for their good work. I always wonder what the background is for such newbies. Does the photographer have previous training? When a photographer uses the aperture variation on the camera so adeptly, it seems as though he must have some prior training or experience in photography. Also the settings, poses and clothes are well thought out. Those types of things usually come with experience. Take a look at Veronik's most recent Freestyle photos. The thing that stands out to me is the use of a combined photo shoot and possible different settings (just look at the dress). It's difficult to discern whether or not the setting is the same, because the use of aperture variation is so well done. Even to be able to combine multiple photo shoots into a single submission is impressive to me. It reminds me very much of a model who was popular by the name of "S" in the past.

It took my hubby and I years to get decent photos, and ours still don't ring out with an "experienced" bell. The first few sets of pictures my husband and I submitted to amateur sites were nothing to be admired. You can go back and see some of my older posts. Even contributors like Nicole and Trinity. You can see the gradual progression from good pictures to great photo sets. This site, more than any other amateur site has always put a strong emphasis on the photographers skills. Since the emphasis has always been so strong on photography skills, my husband and I purchased a nice DSLR camera and he practiced and read books to improve his skills.

It would be nice to get responses from contributors like Veronik, Vilena and Miss Alissa. Would be interested to hear about you and your photographers backgrounds? How did you create such amazing images from the start? Quite impressive, really. Again, my hats off to your for such high quality images. :)

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 8:45 am
by Elise
Here's a link to a few posts from "S" in the past. Very similar photographic skills, poses, etc.. http://voyeurweb.com/winners.2008/20070 ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://voyeurweb.com/winners.2008/20070 ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://voyeurweb.com/winners.2008/20070 ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://voyeurweb.com/winners.2008/20070 ... index.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Not sure if any of you have been around long enough to remember her. Worth a look for sure, and don't you agree? The photos are quite similar!! :mrgreen:

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 2:05 pm
by Jbe
OH YEAH... I remember "S". I always thought she was one of the most classically beautiful women ever to grace this site.... and there have been some real beauties come through. And thankfully there still are... like Elise :mrgreen: and Trinity... Alexa... Nicole... the list goes on.

Great comments, Elise. It's interesting to note different people's opinions and thoughts as to what makes one contri a hit and not another. It's not always about the looks.

Re: Sexy (????) Veronik

Posted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 4:01 pm
by Thinker
I do agree that good photography skills will be the difference between some sets. Just like a model's facial expression. Sometimes a model tries to imitate a fashion model's "hard look," but it does nothing to enhance the model. Now a warm smile or a smirk, when appropriate, will put the picture over the edge.