Discuss and interact with contributors and members about Private Shots.
By SomeDude
#65143
Today's score in PS alone: 2 out of 6, taking 2 of the top 4 winning places, currently scheduled to "win" $1100.

Ignoring this problem doesn't make it not be a problem.
User avatar
By RCNCO
#65878
SomeDude wrote:Today's score in PS alone: 2 out of 6, taking 2 of the top 4 winning places, currently scheduled to "win" $1100.

Ignoring this problem doesn't make it not be a problem.

Agreed. I am pretty frustrated over there whole thing. If they don't want to run it then sell them damned thing to someone who does.
By Jbe
#65975
I wonder about this one Brandon- Red lady Doubled. I'm not saying they are stolen... but this is the same gal that was posting back in 2009. I have no idea if it is the same contributor, but she is using the same name.

Now I'd almost be willing to bet this one IS stolen. Sexy Nessa. If memory serves me, back a few years ago she went by Anna and was eventually outed as a fake. Rock, you and I had a conversation about this very gal recently. I just looked at my archives . This is the same contri posted 12-20-10 titled Anna- Christmas Party.
User avatar
By FastFive
#65993
I already reported the set from "Nessa" as well... did a Google reverse image search and found those same pics on other sites and blogs dating back as far as 2010, and they had a VW watermark on them from back then too. So not only is it a stolen set, but a recycled stolen set. :roll:
User avatar
By rockclimber
#66008
Jbe wrote:I wonder about this one Brandon- Red lady Doubled. I'm not saying they are stolen... but this is the same gal that was posting back in 2009. I have no idea if it is the same contributor, but she is using the same name.

Now I'd almost be willing to bet this one IS stolen. Sexy Nessa. If memory serves me, back a few years ago she went by Anna and was eventually outed as a fake. Rock, you and I had a conversation about this very gal recently. I just looked at my archives . This is the same contri posted 12-20-10 titled Anna- Christmas Party.

You are correct John.

That is Anna who said she was from Sweden and used to chat quite a bit on the forums here with us. At some point she posted a set of pictures with school books in Ukrainian on the covers and we came to find out then she was from the Ukraine and the postings were coming from an IP address that was used for a lot of different things. Igor thought it was a gang who was trying to win the contest so they would get money.

The good thing that came out of it was iris and her boyfriend Viiela (sic) decided to speak up and say "hey we live in the Ukraine and we're nice people. " They both participated for a couple of years until the crash and their contributions were amazing. They were a great couple and I wish they would return.

If this is Anna, which it is, also an old contri reused, I don't particularly care she Swedish or Ukrainian she is beautiful.

Regardless whether these are old images or new. It's not a hobby or a pastime that people seem to do with consistency. I think women, especially mothers, get wrapped up in the lives of their families and children which is as it should be, and set there photographic hobby aside for a while.

Then, there comes a time when they want to reconnect with their feminine side as a woman, as a lover, as someone who is desired and desirable. This is when they start to post again.

So I would have to say I'm grateful for both sides. They are endlessly fascinating creatures women are. Take the time to peel back the layers and find hwr personality that resides inside. Learn her wants and her needs and life is all the better for it.

Well, that was a tangent I went off on. If it is her posting then ok, if not then that should be removed.
User avatar
By FastFive
#66015
Onto today's contris:

Voyteurweb "we don't give a shit if it's stolen" attitude has reached an all new high. Or low...

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... l-ice-show" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

The contributor didn't even bother to edit the video to hide the fact that it's simply a stolen webcam show from MFC. :roll: And VW just passed it through to us. :roll:

The user basically paid a few bucks to get a private cam session with the girl, recorded it, and submitted it as his own. Seriously? :roll:

Total bullshit. The fact that VW can't even be bothered to reject something so blatantly ripped off is pathetic. :roll:
By Jbe
#66027
Does make you wonder, doesn't it Fast?!

Yeah, Rock... you kinda did go off on a tangent. :roll: You are right on about Iris and Veiiia. They did some outstanding work.
User avatar
By FastFive
#66177
Here's a new one:

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -kazakstan" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Posted by: thomski57
Met this girl on a holiday in Kaz. Many of these photos were taken by a pro photographer and to you none believers none are photo shopped . They are just taken in a studio with Natalia's female Photographer..
So basically, he's admitting that either a) he's a pro photographer, or b) he's using a pro photographer's images to submit and profit from himself.

:roll:
User avatar
By Thinker
#66196
Unless he met a woman and was able to convince her to have a photoshoot that he arranged with the professional photographer. Not a likely scenario, but possible.
By Jbe
#66320
I'm pretty sure this one is stolen/recycled as well. I have a pic of her in my archives when she posted as "Uma". Unfortunately hers is one of the few I did not put a date with it.

Sexy GF
User avatar
By FastFive
#66321
Someone else spotted it too... posted as Uma, found all over the net dating back to 2012, including right here from VW at that time. :roll:

VW is helping the environment... they recycle. :|
By Jbe
#66331
I guess that is one way to look at it, Fast. I see that several people caught it as being stolen/recycled.
By Jbe
#66332
My comments on her contri keep disappearing! I guess somebody at VW or the submitter doesn't like me calling out the fraud. :evil:
User avatar
By rockclimber
#66367
John, it could be that she is reporting the comments and VW's looking at the comments and deciding that they're going to stay?

Fast, if you look at the properties of the file that you saved, the JPG file, it should show the date you saved it. Right click on the thumbnail.
User avatar
By rockclimber
#66371
I found Uma and I found a search of her in some sort of search site for pornstars from about 10 months ago. Perhaps the other posting was 10 months old? I also found several other picture sets, I think three total? And a website with a nasty virus, so lucky me.
User avatar
By FastFive
#66372
rockclimber wrote: Fast, if you look at the properties of the file that you saved, the JPG file, it should show the date you saved it. Right click on the thumbnail.
RC I'm not talking about saved files... just what I've found online doing a reverse image search on Google.
User avatar
By rockclimber
#66375
FastFive wrote:
rockclimber wrote: Fast, if you look at the properties of the file that you saved, the JPG file, it should show the date you saved it. Right click on the thumbnail.
RC I'm not talking about saved files... just what I've found online doing a reverse image search on Google.
My error, that was John's comment.

I remember that snow post we may have a thread about it here? I wouldn't be surprised.
By Jbe
#66376
Rock, the pic I have was saved in Feb. 2011 but it is not from the contri in question. Looks like that contri may have been from 2012 but I doubt we'll find a thread since the crash happened in late 2012 and the Forums didn't get back up and running until Dec. 30, 2012.
User avatar
By rockclimber
#66380
Jbe wrote:Rock, the pic I have was saved in Feb. 2011 but it is not from the contri in question. Looks like that contri may have been from 2012 but I doubt we'll find a thread since the crash happened in late 2012 and the Forums didn't get back up and running until Dec. 30, 2012.
That was what I meant. Should have been clearer.

Even as crappy and inefficient as it is right now, I still like this place.

I wish we could effect some changes to make the site better but unfortunately nobody seems to be listening.

Which is a shame, I think it would make a lot more money for the owners and be a lot more fun for the users if things were promptly attended to.

I even suggested raising the subscription rates to cover any additional costs of administration. The RCers would probably hate me for that but too bad.

I think it needs a little bit more administrative help. Full time. The online presence and administration should be obvious.

Oh well.... I never have been one to easily brush off things I think need fixing, I'll just keep repeating Oh well, oh well.... Ha ha!
By SomeDude
#66576
Let's be frank - the administrative cost of looking at a contri, looking for some really simple patterns, right clicking on the ones that are suspicious and then banning the offenders is pretty close to zero. We have readers in this thread that do exactly that (only report instead of ban...) and the site doesn't even care enough to read and act them. I've offered to help.

Still, to show had bad this process is, I kept a log of reports I made for December.

As always, some of these may be legit posters that are just posting to multiple sites, so I'd be careful about branding them all as copy/pasters, but the front page says "All the models displayed on our network are 100% exclusive and can't be found elsewhere on the internet! "

FS

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 02-sexy-gf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; "Lisa" was "Uma" last time this set was posted in 2011 http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/313696 ... -Voyeurweb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - forget about detecting images from other sites, VW doesn't even recognize/dupe-check posts from THEIR OWN SITE.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ot-evening" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; was "Viko" when she was a winner on Watchersweb in 2009. http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/1706017/viko" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... 1236605823" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - most of the posts by this submitter are questionable.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... d-flashing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://nudistik.com/ero/grud/2868-devch ... -grud.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -the-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; from 2013 http://pornupdates.net/voyeur-pics/topi ... ml#p137440" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -the-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://home-foto.info/prostitutki/1023- ... garha.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; wtih copyrights cut from 2006 at http://i14.truepic.org/u/b1/163/NgQFK.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://truepic.org/NgQFK" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - most of his contris are suspect.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -of-brazil" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - there's a story to the 'Selma' series, but I've not totally figured it out. I'm guessing they're from http://www.selmabrasil.com/fotos/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Individual photos show up here and there but they may be vid caps or something.
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ach-brazil" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; similarly, is http://www.debonairblog.com/blog/2015/0 ... heeks.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and http://xossip.com/showthread.php?t=1116045&page=11663" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... v-flashing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.freepornjpg.com/sexy-flashing.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/ay69 ... -ok-CR.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Everything by this poster comes from 2-3 web sets.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 8801-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://xhamster.com/photos/gallery/4766 ... useme.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... a-outdoors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; was a winner at another site, why not recycle it? http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... &year=2015" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

EIP
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ountryside" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is by Fiorentino. Every post made by that account is questionable. http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/SIYA ... 876266.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; or http://www.teenpornjpg.com/nonporn-hot-and-sexy.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -stockings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

PS

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... shnet-body" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.mondexhibition.com/medias/view/48350" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -ninfomana" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.quenovias.com/galeria/le-gus ... 34092.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 0-moi-sexy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.rabbitfinder.com/photos-amat ... -mel-sexy/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... he-weekend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.free-sex.com/contri/contri.p ... 09&site=pv" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... striptease" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a 2013 winner at a competing site http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... 1376414427" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ie-a-letto" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.blondepornjpg.com/blonde-ita ... tits.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.gallery-dump.com/index.php?gid=484509" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://imgur.com/a/0HBIs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... tits-maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/387823 ... MILF-Maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.girlscv.com/Gallery/77128358 ... MILF_Maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... om-hungary" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://anon-v.com/albums/324/dora-from-hungary-exposed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.realteengirls.org/?p=40044" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... you-to-cum" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is
http://www.fetishpornpic.com/alice-wear ... kirt.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... rench-slut" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a poster that's come up before. I can't find this exact shoot, but most of the others have been web retreads.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... s-her-body" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.upskirtpornpic.com/alice-in- ... kirt.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://imagearn.com/gallery.php?id=655658" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... turkey-day" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.nudelas.com/amadora-730/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/533091 ... lethic-Ass" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... g-lovers-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is
http://ipostnaked.com/user/contri/contr ... iID=168984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and http://www.adultism.com/album/424370" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -our-condo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - like everything from this poster - is frmo a pro site http://www.exposingdeborahlynn.com/join ... condo.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; likewise
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... invitation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -red-dress" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://milfs.xxxlog.co/2013/12/07/matur ... ears-milf/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -madeleine" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; used to be Jackie sometimes http://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=191939" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.nudedxxx.com/photo/milf-jackie.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... hat-i-knew" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is another repeat offender. That's porn star Ann Angel. http://imagearn.com/image.php?id=3041171" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://ftop.ru/67036/1920_1080" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://ftop.ru/images/201307/ftop.ru_67036.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... stmas-gift" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -newly-wed" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... wife-s-ass" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; appears as http://www.adultism.com/album/415521" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/579012 ... s-Ass?gen=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... hy-from-uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://x2.fap.to/images/full/51/101/1012914669.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... rom-europe" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.watchersweb.com/sub_preview. ... 1450827717" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... r-exposure" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... girlfriend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... lf-sandhya" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... an-erotica" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... girlfriend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ptous-wife" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; are Indian women by repeat offenders that keep deleting comments and that can't get banned. I'm beyond even pasting links.

EC

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... l-ice-show" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is so flagrantly ripped from MFC that it's not even funny.


WIS is so totally overrun with copy-pasters I don't even go there...
User avatar
By FastFive
#66617
Put all together into one list like that makes it look even more ridiculous. :lol: Very amateur work by VW. :roll:

The only "bright side" is that none of the fakes won anything significant. All the big money winners (I think) are legit. There's one that won $100 but it looks like that's it.
By SomeDude
#66643
I agree fastfive. It IS ridiculous. What's even more ridiculous is that I submitted reports for every one of these and we can predict how many of them will still be there in a week.

Bigdeskjet I don't think that the pros are the problem. In only a very few of the cases cited above were they 'pro' shoots - and the some of the ones that were were taken from commercial sites with the logos cropped out. The mess that happened last time they tried to quarantine the pro sets is that it's really hard to identify 'pro' and they tried to force some great contris into that category. This site has some recurring contributors that are as gorgeous as any model with amazing photographers that pick great sets and execute great shots and escape drama. The current generation would include Marilyn, Elise, Nick2009, CarolinaB, Carrie, Berta, Heidi, Freshman Sue, Valminga, and certainly others. Treating them as pros is clearly wrong. We have a few others (dex33, Gordon Earle) that come up with a surprising stream of models and it'd be tempting to consider them as pros, but I think they, too, leave the site better than they found it and provide us with some great original contris that aren't from ladies we'll see an AVN or that have their own sites or whatever. There are few enough of these that they're easy to recognize. The ones that ARE pro shoots are almost certainly not put here by the owners anyway. There's no way that Briana Lee's pics from her web site are here because she gave them to vmbass to post with the logos cropped out. I'm equally sure there's no way that thomski57 wasn't hanging out with Ann Angel and she suggested that she widen her audience by posting her shots from her own commercial site here.

What IS the problem, IMO, is the losers copy/pasting sets from the web and submitting them here. When a single poster has 71 contris that are all "my girlfriend" or "my wife", but they're all different women, that should set off some alarms. When a poster is deleting huge numbers of comments containing the word "stolen", that should set off alarms. When your "hottest wife" is Amy one month, but Ravina the next - and the same girl, that should set off alarms. Reports should actually be read and acted on and offending accounts banned with the sets archived.

It takes a lot of courage for a real amateur to post. (We have - and not under this name.) Every comment, every view, every vote, every entry on the monthly winner's page - everything that goes to someone that doesn't actually even know their pictures are here takes away from actual contributors that got the courage to do it. That participation is what this site used to be about, not a tumblr style dumping ground for people to repost things they found on the web.

It's time for the site to regain control of their reputation. That's a combination of listening to viewers' reports, using automation to spot unusual comment deletion, politely declining some contris ("I see that you - or someone that's impersonating you - already posted this on a competing site, and we're about original and exclusive content, so we can't use it. In your next shoot, please include the VW logo or a sign somewhere.") and just plain kicking some people - and all their fake-ass contris - to the curb.

Voyeurweb, if you're looking for an admin to help get this under control, drop me a line.
By Jbe
#66666
Very well said, SomeDude. Unfortunately it's the same thing a lot of us have been saying for years. There are a few people that would like to see some serious changes made to this site but since Admin doesn't seem to pay any attention those people have pretty much given up.

I totally agree with you about dex33, Gordon Earle- and some others. Can they really know that many women that want their pics taken and not be at least semi-pro photographers? Are they really doing the photo shoots out of the goodness of their hearts and at no charge? And IF they do charge, doesn't that make them pros?

Bigdeskjet, I remember when VW had the Girls With Sites Section and if memory serves me, there was another section (pre-crash) that was after the GWS was closed out. The contris were of "pros" but were not allowed to be part of the monthly competition. I just don't remember what it was called.

I don't peruse any other sites though I used to occasionally view WW and would see a lot of the same gals- though usually different pics even if they were obviously from the same shoot. So I am impressed with your listing of possible fakes/recycled/stolen contris. If even half of them fit into that category, that is pretty sad and doesn't say much for this site. Sounds like you would be a huge benefit to VW in spotting possible "fakes".
By SomeDude
#66675
Thank you. If it's not clear, I actually have been around for years.

The likes of dex33 and Gordon Earle don't bother me. (If I had a wish, it'd be that the models participate in the comments, but that's not uncommon...) They bring some really good content and I really see no evidence that any of them - models or shooters - are paid professionals. To me, the 'pro' term is to exclude people that make their living at it. Real amateurs - the kind this site caters to - probably don't want to be next to Playboy's shooters working with Sunny Leone or Sasha Grey. Even there, the lines can get fuzzy these days - someone comfortable with a VW shoot might try, say, camming on MFC. Are they now a pro? What if they mention in the comments "see more at ..." and link to a deviantart shoot or a 4cam room? Fuzzy! When dex had 3 ladies, he raised my eyebrow. When he had 10 and none of them showed up elsewhere on the web and he kept posting, I was like "good for him!". Ditto with Gordon Earle.

I share your recollection that GWS had a successor, but I don't recall the details as the site was in a tailspin at that point. It was pretty disastrous, IIRC, in both implementation and in reception of the VW audience - which is nowhere what it was years ago.

I don't think anywhere near half of the list I posted is actual contributors playing on multiple courts. There are some, and I think they wouldn't be difficult to identify and work with. I called them out because I think they're worth some special administrative attention. Several of the cases clearly had watermarks cropped out; it was someone taking pictures from one and putting them on the other. The huge majority of that list - which is pretty typical on VW these days - is people copy/pasting sets from the web. Even if they DO own it (and I'd wager most don't) it's not original material.
By Jbe
#66681
SomeDude, it was clear that you have been around for a while. I apologize if I inferred anything other than that. VW needs more people like you that would like to see the site improved. Unfortunately if Admin isn't going to do anything about it then it's just beating a dead horse.

As far as the models from dex33 et al, it would be nice if the models actually participated. That is one thing that has bugged me is that more models do not participate on the Forums even after being invited over. That is one reason I don't spend much time looking at contris from dex33, Gordon Earle, James D and possibly others because I know it isn't likely the models will participate. :cry:
By SomeDude
#66684
Model participation (both in the comments and here) is nearly dead. The same robot accounts keep posting the same comments over and over. Some of the commenters are just unnecessarily mean - if you don't dig tattoos or piercings or whatever, click the button and move on instead of being an unappreciative jerk. You'll notice that even the regulars that definitely ARE real participants rarely respond. That 'flag inappropriate comment' works about as well as 'report post' - the same people keep saying the same jerkwad things and don't get called out on it or muted. (If I were king of VW, I'd totally implement shadow-banning...)

Commenting is also a trap. in http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... e-lingerie" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Natalieastak says, "I'm the total exhibitionist! I also fantasize about having a sex party with total strangers." Sure sounds like someone that would read and respond to comments, but there are none. Why? Because this isn't her. There's a natalieastak on reddit that is, quite deservedly, popular and these photos are ones she posted two years ago and many times since. She's still active on reddit and THAT natalieastak definitely responded there when it was posted two years ago at https://www.reddit.com/r/gonewild/comme ... _come_off/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; (And if it IS her, she understands verification and exclusivity from reddit...) Parts of that shoot appear in other posts, but these pics are All Over The Web. Oh, wait, that's for January's stolen pics.

Seriously, do people not recognize and question this stuff?
By Jbe
#66799
Nope. If it's on the internet it MUST be legit. :roll: :roll: :roll:

Those robot accounts drive me freaking nuts posting the same comment on every contri. Do they really work? And the mean comments have been around for as long as I've been on the site. What is with those people? They get to see naked women for FREE and yet they just don't seem to appreciate that. What is so difficult about just moving on if you don't like it? (Rhetorical question...)

What really cracks me up is when those guys gripe about tattoos or piercings. Are those guys saying that if those particular women offered themselves to those commenters they would turn the women down? I think NOT! Some people just have to criticize someone else so they can feel better about themselves. Sad...

And sadly the general quality of the contris are going down. The good contributors get tired of reading mean comments and just go away. But the commenters making those rude comments just don't get that. Heavy sigh...
By SomeDude
#66853
It's true. Comments and just a bit of anonymity bring out the worst in people. That's why shadow-bans are awesome. If the same comment appears more than N times or > X percent of someone's posts get reported, only the poster can see it and they have no idea why nobody's getting worked up about their stupid comments.

The ones that have to comment on Every Single Post do indeed make it difficult - in multiple ways - for real contributors to interact. Jerk commenters definitely run off contributors. Besides, it's not like someone is going to get a tattoo removed because some anonymous loser in his mom's basement said online that her tattoos were ugly. Many of the awesome contributors never respond to comments just because they're such a scary place to even visit.

As long as I can remember, VW has run in cycles of good and bad. It's like seasons on TV. I used to think that it was better when you needed a real camera with real film and both model and photographer had to put some thought into it instead of pulling the camera out of your pocket and shooting in terrible light without picking up the floor in your single-wide. Memory lane and a (now expired) subscription to Funbags made me realize I had a selective memory. The amazing shots I remember from ten years ago (or more!) stuck in my memory for a reason. I don't look at Memory Lane and find it totally eclipsing the current generation.

What I don't remember is the site totally ignoring things as intently as they have recently. Heck, during and after the Great Event of 2012 - that left everyone worse off - they were at least lying to us. Remember Kiki that was brought on for damage control? (Talk about the era of stolen contris...) Now they just ignore us and that's more frustrating. The 'Igor' character seems to be gone from even that other site.

I guess it's time for January's Stolen Pics thread, eh? Sigh.
By SomeDude
#66855
Yep. It's time to start the Jan name-and-shame thread. Right now, the top two posters slated for $1950 in winnings, are copy/paste jobs that are first time posters.
User avatar
By RalphieC
#66857
Just noticed in the Global Rankings that the #2 contri - BF Boss Fucked My Ass - posted on 5th Jan in Homeclips.

I'm not a member of Homeclips so cannot actually view the clip but was sure I recognised the lady from the thumbnail pic shown in the rankings. I am certain it's Eva Johnson, a Romanian pornstar.

I cannot report it as not a member of Homeclips as prev stated (although reporting is pointless!) - prob easier to report to the website it's been stolen from! LOL
User avatar
By malludesi
#85281
SomeDude wrote:Let's be frank - the administrative cost of looking at a contri, looking for some really simple patterns, right clicking on the ones that are suspicious and then banning the offenders is pretty close to zero. We have readers in this thread that do exactly that (only report instead of ban...) and the site doesn't even care enough to read and act them. I've offered to help.

Still, to show had bad this process is, I kept a log of reports I made for December.

As always, some of these may be legit posters that are just posting to multiple sites, so I'd be careful about branding them all as copy/pasters, but the front page says "All the models displayed on our network are 100% exclusive and can't be found elsewhere on the internet! "

FS

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 02-sexy-gf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; "Lisa" was "Uma" last time this set was posted in 2011 http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/313696 ... -Voyeurweb" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - forget about detecting images from other sites, VW doesn't even recognize/dupe-check posts from THEIR OWN SITE.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ot-evening" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; was "Viko" when she was a winner on Watchersweb in 2009. http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/1706017/viko" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... 1236605823" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - most of the posts by this submitter are questionable.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... d-flashing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://nudistik.com/ero/grud/2868-devch ... -grud.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -the-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; from 2013 http://pornupdates.net/voyeur-pics/topi ... ml#p137440" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -the-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://home-foto.info/prostitutki/1023- ... garha.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; wtih copyrights cut from 2006 at http://i14.truepic.org/u/b1/163/NgQFK.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://truepic.org/NgQFK" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - most of his contris are suspect.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -of-brazil" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - there's a story to the 'Selma' series, but I've not totally figured it out. I'm guessing they're from http://www.selmabrasil.com/fotos/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Individual photos show up here and there but they may be vid caps or something.
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ach-brazil" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; similarly, is http://www.debonairblog.com/blog/2015/0 ... heeks.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and http://xossip.com/showthread.php?t=1116045&page=11663" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... v-flashing" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.freepornjpg.com/sexy-flashing.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/ay69 ... -ok-CR.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; Everything by this poster comes from 2-3 web sets.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 8801-beach" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://xhamster.com/photos/gallery/4766 ... useme.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... a-outdoors" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; was a winner at another site, why not recycle it? http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... &year=2015" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

EIP
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ountryside" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is by Fiorentino. Every post made by that account is questionable. http://x.imagefapusercontent.com/u/SIYA ... 876266.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; or http://www.teenpornjpg.com/nonporn-hot-and-sexy.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -stockings" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

PS

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... shnet-body" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.mondexhibition.com/medias/view/48350" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -ninfomana" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.quenovias.com/galeria/le-gus ... 34092.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... 0-moi-sexy" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.rabbitfinder.com/photos-amat ... -mel-sexy/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... he-weekend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.free-sex.com/contri/contri.p ... 09&site=pv" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... striptease" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a 2013 winner at a competing site http://www.watchersweb.com/winners/win_ ... 1376414427" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ie-a-letto" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.blondepornjpg.com/blonde-ita ... tits.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.gallery-dump.com/index.php?gid=484509" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://imgur.com/a/0HBIs" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... tits-maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/387823 ... MILF-Maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.girlscv.com/Gallery/77128358 ... MILF_Maria" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... om-hungary" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://anon-v.com/albums/324/dora-from-hungary-exposed/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.realteengirls.org/?p=40044" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... you-to-cum" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is
http://www.fetishpornpic.com/alice-wear ... kirt.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... rench-slut" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is a poster that's come up before. I can't find this exact shoot, but most of the others have been web retreads.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... s-her-body" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.upskirtpornpic.com/alice-in- ... kirt.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://imagearn.com/gallery.php?id=655658" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... turkey-day" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.nudelas.com/amadora-730/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/533091 ... lethic-Ass" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... g-lovers-1" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is
http://ipostnaked.com/user/contri/contr ... iID=168984" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and http://www.adultism.com/album/424370" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -our-condo" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; - like everything from this poster - is frmo a pro site http://www.exposingdeborahlynn.com/join ... condo.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; likewise
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... invitation" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -red-dress" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://milfs.xxxlog.co/2013/12/07/matur ... ears-milf/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -madeleine" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; used to be Jackie sometimes http://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=191939" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.nudedxxx.com/photo/milf-jackie.shtml" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... hat-i-knew" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is another repeat offender. That's porn star Ann Angel. http://imagearn.com/image.php?id=3041171" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://ftop.ru/67036/1920_1080" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://ftop.ru/images/201307/ftop.ru_67036.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... stmas-gift" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... -newly-wed" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... wife-s-ass" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; appears as http://www.adultism.com/album/415521" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; http://www.imagefap.com/pictures/579012 ... s-Ass?gen=" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; and others

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... hy-from-uk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://x2.fap.to/images/full/51/101/1012914669.jpg" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... rom-europe" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is http://www.watchersweb.com/sub_preview. ... 1450827717" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://mallu-desi.blogspot.com/2017/03/ ... sy-hd.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... r-exposure" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... girlfriend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... lf-sandhya" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... an-erotica" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... girlfriend" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... ptous-wife" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; are Indian women by repeat offenders that keep deleting comments and that can't get banned. I'm beyond even pasting links.

EC

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/ ... l-ice-show" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; is so flagrantly ripped from MFC that it's not even funny.


WIS is so totally overrun with copy-pasters I don't even go there...
Thanks Man
User avatar
By koalalist
#86382
EIP
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... ountryside is by Fiorentino. Every post made by that account is questionable.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -stockings

PS

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... shnet-body

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -ninfomana

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... 0-moi-sexy

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... he-weekend

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... striptease

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... ie-a-letto

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... tits-maria

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... om-hungary

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... you-to-cum

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... rench-slut is a poster that's come up before. I can't find this exact shoot, but most of the others have been web retreads.

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... s-her-body

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... turkey-day

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... g-lovers-1

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -our-condo
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... invitation and
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -red-dress

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -madeleine used to be Jackie sometimes http://forum.oneclickchicks.com/showthread.php?t=191939" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... hat-i-knew is another repeat offender. That's porn star Ann Angel.
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... stmas-gift
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... -newly-wed

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... wife-s-ass

http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... hy-from-uk
http://www.voyeurweb.com/contributions/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... rom-europe
Last edited by RavenVW on Wed Apr 19, 2017 2:49 pm, edited 1 time in total. Reason: other websites were included. if reporting as stolen, please send it directly to support@voyeurweb.com along with the said websites where they were found for investigation.
Committee Suppressed

AND YET AGAIN what johnforbes is trying to say is […]

johnny, your old partisan song and dance is not &q[…]

8th Amendment

Geezus, sillydummy, inform yourself already. Trum[…]

The Engoron theory was utter nonsense and the enti[…]

The Best Man for the Job?

Surprisingly, Scientific American has leaned to th[…]

Mr Forbes does have the strength of a machine. An[…]

Had Kamala been an apple/tomato/cherry/peach pick[…]

8th Amendment

We have all been wondering, in the context of the […]