Open Discussions about the VoyeurWeb.com site
By RalphGhe
#62918
Why did the section "What I Saw" end? Someone earlier commented that there were only wives and girlfriends in it so what was the need for it. Actually there were many true voyeur photos there. So now the site VoyeurWeb has no voyeur photos which were the draw for it in the early years.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62921
Legal (and even moral) issues would be my best guess.
By RalphGhe
#62937
What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62949
RalphGhe wrote:What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
That's a very narrow minded view. Do a little Googling before laying down the law. :roll:
Committee Suppressed

AND YET AGAIN what johnforbes is trying to say is […]

johnny, your old partisan song and dance is not &q[…]

8th Amendment

Geezus, sillydummy, inform yourself already. Trum[…]

The Engoron theory was utter nonsense and the enti[…]

The Best Man for the Job?

Surprisingly, Scientific American has leaned to th[…]

Mr Forbes does have the strength of a machine. An[…]

Had Kamala been an apple/tomato/cherry/peach pick[…]

8th Amendment

We have all been wondering, in the context of the […]