Open Discussions about the VoyeurWeb.com site
By RalphGhe
#62918
Why did the section "What I Saw" end? Someone earlier commented that there were only wives and girlfriends in it so what was the need for it. Actually there were many true voyeur photos there. So now the site VoyeurWeb has no voyeur photos which were the draw for it in the early years.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62921
Legal (and even moral) issues would be my best guess.
By RalphGhe
#62937
What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
User avatar
By FastFive
#62949
RalphGhe wrote:What is done in public is by definition, public, and can be recorded. There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. Some countries may have laws different but generally public displays a not protected.
That's a very narrow minded view. Do a little Googling before laying down the law. :roll:
Forbes is Real, Not Fictitious

Reality is real. The fabulous Forbes is real, and[…]

It seems like the leftist are drinking early today[…]

The Babylon Bee: " Concerned citizens of nat[…]

Obliterated what?

I agree 20,000 ballots wouldn't sway the entire re[…]

I give credit to the worthy Mr Forbes for accurate[…]

Thoughts?

"But Zelensky doesn't want peace."-john&[…]

True Republican Values On Parade

Look at the facts and photos, johnny: https://www[…]